简体   繁体   English

如何提高INSERT上的PostgreSQL性能?

[英]How to improve PostgreSQL performance on INSERT?

I have written a Node.js application that writes lots of records to a PostgreSQL 9.6 database. 我已经编写了一个Node.js应用程序,该应用程序将许多记录写入PostgreSQL 9.6数据库。 Unfortunately, it feels quite slow. 不幸的是,感觉很慢。 To be able to test things I have created a short but complete program that reproduces the scenario: 为了能够进行测试,我创建了一个简短但完整的程序来重现场景:

'use strict';

const async = require('async'),
      pg = require('pg'),
      uuid = require('uuidv4');

const pool = new pg.Pool({
  protocol: 'pg',
  user: 'golo',
  host: 'localhost',
  port: 5432,
  database: 'golo'
});

const records = [];

for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
  records.push({ id: uuid(), revision: i, data: { foo: 'bar', bar: 'baz' }, flag: true });
}

pool.connect((err, database, close) => {
  if (err) {
    /* eslint-disable no-console */
    return console.log(err);
    /* eslint-enable no-console */
  }

  database.query(`
    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS "foo" (
      "position" bigserial NOT NULL,
      "id" uuid NOT NULL,
      "revision" integer NOT NULL,
      "data" jsonb NOT NULL,
      "flag" boolean NOT NULL,

      CONSTRAINT "foo_pk" PRIMARY KEY("position"),
      CONSTRAINT "foo_index_id_revision" UNIQUE ("id", "revision")
    );
  `, errQuery => {
    if (errQuery) {
      /* eslint-disable no-console */
      return console.log(errQuery);
      /* eslint-enable no-console */
    }

    async.series({
      beginTransaction (done) {
        /* eslint-disable no-console */
        console.time('foo');
        /* eslint-enable no-console */
        database.query('BEGIN', done);
      },
      saveRecords (done) {
        async.eachSeries(records, (record, doneEach) => {
          database.query({
            name: 'save',
            text: `
              INSERT INTO "foo"
                ("id", "revision", "data", "flag")
              VALUES
                ($1, $2, $3, $4) RETURNING position;
            `,
            values: [ record.id, record.revision, record.data, record.flag ]
          }, (errQuery2, result) => {
            if (errQuery2) {
              return doneEach(errQuery2);
            }

            record.position = Number(result.rows[0].position);
            doneEach(null);
          });
        }, done);
      },
      commitTransaction (done) {
        database.query('COMMIT', done);
      }
    }, errSeries => {
      /* eslint-disable no-console */
      console.timeEnd('foo');
      /* eslint-enable no-console */
      if (errSeries) {
        return database.query('ROLLBACK', errRollback => {
          close();

          if (errRollback) {
            /* eslint-disable no-console */
            return console.log(errRollback);
            /* eslint-enable no-console */
          }
          /* eslint-disable no-console */
          console.log(errSeries);
          /* eslint-enable no-console */
        });
      }

      close();
      /* eslint-disable no-console */
      console.log('Done!');
      /* eslint-enable no-console */
    });
  });
});

The performance I get for inserting 10.000 rows is 2.5 seconds. 我插入10.000行获得的性能为2.5秒。 This is not bad, but also not great. 这还不错,但也不是很好。 What can I do to improve speed? 我该如何提高速度?

Some thoughts that I had so far: 到目前为止,我有一些想法:

  • Use prepared statements. 使用准备好的语句。 As you can see I have done this, this speeded up things by ~30 %. 如您所见,我已经这样做了,这使事情速度提高了约30%。
  • Insert multiple rows at once using a single INSERT command. 使用单个INSERT命令一次插入多行。 Unfortunately, this is not possible, as in reality, the number of records that need to be written varies from call to call and a varying number of arguments makes it impossible to use prepared statements. 不幸的是,这是不可能的,因为实际上,需要编写的记录数量因调用而异,并且参数数量的变化使得无法使用准备好的语句。
  • Use COPY instead of INSERT : I can't use this, since this happens at runtime, not at initialization time. 使用COPY而不是INSERT :我不能使用它,因为这是在运行时发生的,而不是在初始化时发生的。
  • Use text instead of jsonb : Didn't change a thing. 使用text而不是jsonb :没有改变。
  • Use json instead of jsonb : Didn't change a thing either. 使用json代替jsonb :也没有改变任何东西。

A few more notes on the data that happens in reality: 关于现实中发生的数据的更多说明:

  • The revision is not necessarily increasing. revision不一定会增加。 This is just a number. 这只是一个数字。
  • The flag is not always true , it can be true and false as well. flag并不总是true ,也可以是truefalse
  • Of course the data field contains different data, too. 当然, data字段也包含不同的数据。

So in the end it comes down to: 因此,最终归结为:

  • What possibilities are there to significantly speed up multiple single calls to INSERT ? 有什么可能显着地加快对INSERT多个单个调用的速度?

Insert multiple rows at once using a single INSERT command. 使用单个INSERT命令一次插入多行。 Unfortunately, this is not possible, as in reality, the number of records that need to be written varies from call to call and a varying number of arguments makes it impossible to use prepared statements. 不幸的是,这是不可能的,因为实际上,需要编写的记录数量因调用而异,并且参数数量的变化使得无法使用准备好的语句。

This is the right answer, followed by an invalid counter-argument. 这是正确的答案,后面是无效的反论点。

You can generate your multi-row inserts in a loop, with some 1000 - 10,000 records per query, depending on the size of the records. 您可以循环生成多行插入,每个记录大约有1000-10,000条记录,具体取决于记录的大小。

And you do not need prepared statements for this at all. 并且您根本不需要准备好的语句。

See this article I wrote about the same issues: Performance Boost . 请参阅我写的有关相同问题的文章: Performance Boost

Following the article, my code was able to insert 10,000 records in under 50ms . 紧随本文之后,我的代码能够在50ms内插入10,000条记录。

A related question: Multi-row insert with pg-promise . 一个相关的问题: 带有pg-promise的多行插入

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM