为什么对内存映射零字节文件的读操作会导致SIGBUS？

Question

Here is the example code I wrote.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>

int main()
{
    int fd;
    long pagesize;
    char *data;

    if ((fd = open("foo.txt", O_RDONLY)) == -1) {
        perror("open");
        return 1;
    }

    pagesize = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
    printf("pagesize: %ld\n", pagesize);

    data = mmap(NULL, pagesize, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
    printf("data: %p\n", data);
    if (data == (void *) -1) {
        perror("mmap");
        return 1;
    }

    printf("%d\n", data[0]);
    printf("%d\n", data[1]);
    printf("%d\n", data[2]);
    printf("%d\n", data[4096]);
    printf("%d\n", data[4097]);
    printf("%d\n", data[4098]);

    return 0;
}

If I provide a zero byte foo.txt to this program, it terminates with SIGBUS.

$ > foo.txt && gcc foo.c && ./a.out 
pagesize: 4096
data: 0x7f8d882ab000
Bus error

If I provide a one byte foo.txt to this program, then there is no such issue.

$ printf A > foo.txt && gcc foo.c && ./a.out 
pagesize: 4096
data: 0x7f5f3b679000
65
0
0
48
56
10

mmap(2) mentions the following.

Use of a mapped region can result in these signals:

SIGSEGV Attempted write into a region mapped as read-only.

SIGBUS Attempted access to a portion of the buffer that does not correspond to the file (for example, beyond the end of the file, including the case where another process has truncated the file).

So if I understand this correctly, even the second test case (1-byte file) should have led to SIGBUS because data[1] and data[2] are trying to access a portion of the buffer ( data ) that does not correspond to the file.

Can you help me understand why only a zero byte file causes this program to fail with SIGBUS?

Answer 1

You get SIGBUS when accessing past the end of last whole mapped page because the POSIX standard states :

The mmap() function can be used to map a region of memory that is larger than the current size of the object. Memory access within the mapping but beyond the current end of the underlying objects may result in SIGBUS signals being sent to the process.

With a zero-byte file, the entire page you mapped is "beyond the current end of the underlying object". So you get SIGBUS .

You do NOT get a SIGBUS when you go beyond the 4kB page you've mapped because that's not within your mapping. You don't get a SIGBUS accessing your mapping when your file is larger than zero bytes because the entire page gets mapped.

But you would get a SIGBUS if you mapped additional pages past the end of the file, such as mapping two 4kB pages for a 1-byte file. If you access that second 4kB page, you'd get SIGBUS .

Answer 2

A 1-byte file does not lead to the crash because mmap will map memory in multiples of the page size and zero the remainder. From the man page:

A file is mapped in multiples of the page size. For a file that is not a multiple of the page size, the remaining memory is zeroed when mapped, and writes to that region are not written out to the file. The effect of changing the size of the underlying file of a mapping on the pages that correspond to added or removed regions of the file is unspecified.