使用 Java 中的静态工厂方法和常量进行生成

Question

In my Android app, I have some very similar classes, let's call them FooA and FooB .

For each of these classes, I have a schema class that contains constants for the columns of the table - FooASchema and FooBSchema :

public final class FooASchema {

    public static final String TABLE_NAME = "foo_a_table";
    public static final String COL_CATEGORY_ID = "category_id";
    public static final String COL_PROPERTY_A = "property_a";
    public static final String COL_PROPERTY_B = "property_b";
    // COL_PROPERTY_C = ...

}


public final class FooBSchema {

    public static final String TABLE_NAME = "foo_b_table";
    public static final String COL_CATEGORY_ID = "category_id";
    public static final String COL_OTHER_PROPERTY_A = "other_property_a";
    // COL_OTHER_PROPERTY_B = ...

}

Both FooA and FooB have a static factory method that enables me to create them using a Cursor :

public static FooA from(Cursor cursor) {
    int categoryId = cursor.getInt(cursor.getColumnIndex(FooASchema.COL_CATEGORY_ID));
    String propertyA = cursor.getString(cursor.getColumnIndex(FooASchema.COL_PROPERTY_A));
    String propertyB = cursor.getString(cursor.getColumnIndex(FooASchema.COL_PROPERTY_B));
    // int propertyC = ...

    return FooA(id, propertyA, propertyB, ...);
}


public static FooB from(Cursor cursor) {
    int categoryId = cursor.getInt(cursor.getColumnIndex(FooBSchema.COL_CATEGORY_ID));
    int otherA = cursor.getInt(cursor.getColumnIndex(FooASchema.COL_OTHER_PROPERTY_A));
    // String otherB = ...

    return FooB(id, otherA, otherB, ...);
}

Finally, I have two util classes that I use to retrieve data from the tables:

public final class FooAUtils {

    public static ArrayList<FooA> getFooAs(Context context, int categoryId) {
        ArrayList<FooA> fooAs = new ArrayList<>();

        Cursor cursor = MyDbHelper.getInstance(context).getReadableDatabase.query(
                FooASchema.TABLE_NAME,
                null,
                FooASchema.COL_CATEGORY_ID + "=?",
                new String[] {String.valueOf(categoryId)},
                null,
                null,
                null);
        cursor.moveToFirst();
        while (!cursor.isAfterLast()) {
            fooAs.add(FooA.from(cursor));
            cursor.moveToNext();
        }
        cursor.close();
        return fooAs;
    }

    // ...
}


public final class FooBUtils {

    public static ArrayList<FooA> getFooBs(Context context, int categoryId) {
        ArrayList<FooB> fooBs = new ArrayList<>();

        Cursor cursor = MyDbHelper.getInstance(context).getReadableDatabase.query(
                FooBSchema.TABLE_NAME,
                null,
                FooBSchema.COL_CATEGORY_ID + "=?",
                new String[] {String.valueOf(categoryId)},
                null,
                null,
                null);
        cursor.moveToFirst();
        while (!cursor.isAfterLast()) {
            fooBs.add(FooB.from(cursor));
            cursor.moveToNext();
        }
        cursor.close();
        return fooBs;
    }

    // ...
}

You can see that most of the code between FooA -related classes and FooB -related classes are very similar, and especially in the util classes - where the code is almost identical.

I want to try to reduce this duplication, and I have been trying to do so using generics (I've read about them, but I haven't yet used them in a project).

For example, I want to be able to have a generic util class. Here's how I thought I could implement it:

public final class FooUtils {

    public static <T> get(Context context, int categoryId) {
        ArrayList<T> items = new ArrayList<>();

        Cursor cursor = MyDbHelper.getInstance(context).getReadableDatabase.query(
                BaseSchema.TABLE_NAME,
                null,
                BaseSchema.COL_CATEGORY_ID + "=?",
                new String[] {String.valueOf(categoryId)},
                null,
                null,
                null);
        cursor.moveToFirst();
        while (!cursor.isAfterLast()) {
            items.add(T.from(cursor)); // ??
            cursor.moveToNext();
        }
        cursor.close();
    }

    // ...

}

Where:

public interface BaseSchema {

    public static final String TABLE_NAME; // can't make this abstract?

    public static final String COL_CATEGORY_ID = "category_id";

}

public final class FooASchema implements BaseSchema { ... }


public final class FooBSchema implements BaseSchema { ... }

But as you can see, I can't do T.from(cursor) , and I can't have an abstract constant TABLE_NAME that the subclasses can implement.

How can I call my static factory method in this way?

Is there a better way of approaching this and reducing code duplication?

Answer 1

In your actual code you don't use an instance of the class to invoke the form() factory, you use a static method of the class :

fooAs.add(FooA.from(cursor));

With generics, you cannot use the parameterized type to invoke a method on it like that items.add(T.from(cursor)); since the generic was erased after the compilation.

In your case, I see two ways of handling the problem :

• introducing a abstract base class with the common method and an abstract method that subclasses have to implement to create a Foo instance ( FooA , FooB ).

• keeping your way of doing and introducing an interface to create a Foo instance. You would have two implementation of it. One for FooA and another one for FooB and you could provide a instance of it in the FooUtils.get() method.

With the first option you could do the following.

Base class

public abstract class AbstractFooProcessing<T extends Foo> {

    public abstract T createFooInstance(Cursor cursor);

    public ArrayList<T> get(Context context, int categoryId) {
        ArrayList<T> items = new ArrayList<>();

        Cursor cursor = MyDbHelper.getInstance(context).getReadableDatabase.query(
                BaseSchema.TABLE_NAME,
                null,
                BaseSchema.COL_CATEGORY_ID + "=?",
                new String[] {String.valueOf(categoryId)},
                null,
                null,
                null);
        cursor.moveToFirst();
        while (!cursor.isAfterLast()) {
            items.add(createFooInstance(cursor));
            cursor.moveToNext();
        }
        cursor.close();
    }

    // ...

}

FooAProcessing

public class FooAProcessing extends AbstractFooProcessing<FooA>{

    @Override
    public FooA createFooInstance(Cursor cursor) {
        return FooA.from(cursor);
    }

}

FooBProcessing

public class FooBProcessing extends AbstractFooProcessing<FooB>{

    @Override
    public FooB createFooInstance(Cursor cursor) {
        return FooB.from(cursor);
    }

}

---

With the second option you could do the following.

FooProcessing interface

public interface FooProcessing<T extends Foo> {    
    T createFooInstance(Cursor cursor);            
}

FooProcessingA

public class FooAProcessing implements FooProcessing<FooA>{

    @Override
    public FooA createFooInstance(Cursor cursor) {
        return FooA.from(cursor);
    }   
}

FooProcessingB

public class FooBProcessing implements FooProcessing<FooB>{

    @Override
    public FooB createFooInstance(Cursor cursor) {
        return FooB.from(cursor);
    }
}

FooUtils updated so that get() takes as argument a FooProcessing factory instance.

public final class FooUtils {

    public static <T extends Foo> ArrayList<T> get(Context context, int categoryId, FooProcessing<T> fooProcessing) {
        ArrayList<T> items = new ArrayList<>();

        Cursor cursor = MyDbHelper.getInstance(context).getReadableDatabase.query(
                BaseSchema.TABLE_NAME,
                null,
                BaseSchema.COL_CATEGORY_ID + "=?",
                new String[] {String.valueOf(categoryId)},
                null,
                null,
                null);
        cursor.moveToFirst();
        while (!cursor.isAfterLast()) {
            items.add(fooProcessing.createFooInstance(cursor)); // ??
            cursor.moveToNext();
        }
        cursor.close();
    }
    // ...
    return items;

}

You can now call the FooUtils.get() method in this way :

...
FooProcessing fooAProcessing =  new FooAProcessing();
...
ArrayList<FooA> fooAs = FooAUtils.getFoo(context, category, fooAProcessing);