性能如何将事件与功能关联？

Question

More precisely how does the perf tool associate PMU events to functions i already realized that when the kernel perf subsystem records the event counters it also records the Program Counter (PC) so it can associate the count to a function.

However to really get fine grain result, you need to sample the counters in a very high rate, otherwise you may associate counters to a group of functions. But reading the counters and writing the sampled data (counters, PC, call-stack) to the perf mmap space is very intrusive.

I read in some sources that this sampling only happens when the PMU counters overflow, but this is can be very coarse unless i am setting the counters to overflow very quickly

what am i missing here ?

Answer 1

perf record is statistical profiling tool , it either program hardware performance event monitor unit (PMU) to overflow after some number of counts (for example with -e cycles -c 1000000 write -1000000 to counter and enable counting cycles; with -F or without freq/period argument it will autotune value), on overflow interrupt perf will reprogram it for next count. So it will have several hundreds or few thousands events per second. Or it can use OS timer interrupt ( -e task-clock ) to get periodic samples. On every sample (or on interrupt from hardware PMU) perf will record current PC (EIP) and/or callstack; and it does not record current value of counter (check full dump of data stored in the perf.data with perf script or perf script -D ; or code of sample event dumping - there is sample->ip but not current count of PMU).

perf report will parse perf.data to get all PC recorded in it. It will count how many times each PC was sampled to build histogram [PC] -> sample_count . Every PC will be associated with the exact function it belongs (perf report will parse memory map, as mmap events are recorded in perf.data too, open every binary used, find symbols table of every binary).

Actual code of perf report is in linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c : cmd_report / __cmd_report -> perf_session__process_events -> some magic -> process_sample_event to record all mentioned in perf.data ip (PC) values with hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &al, rep->max_stack, rep); into histogram with hist_iter__report_callback :

hist_entry__inc_addr_samples(he, evsel->idx, al->addr);
. . . (perf/util/annotate.c) __symbol__inc_addr_samples
  611         h->addr[offset]++;

Then it will output collected histogram with report__browse_hists -> perf_evlist__tty_browse_hists -> hists__fprintf_nr_sample_events(hists, rep, evname, stdout); .

Every sample is already associated with exact function (and bit inexact instruction inside it because of out-of-order nature of CPUs and not-precise PMU overflow event), and this is how statistical profiling works . When your program runs for short time (less than second) and/or you have too low sampling frequency, you may have few samples recorded in perf.data . But if you has more than several hundreds samples, you can find most cpu-heavy functions (they probably have pareto rule and runs for around several dozens percents of program run time. When you want to see smaller functions (around several percent of running time), use thousands or tens or thousands samples and do some statistical estimations (you will not get correct percent of function which runs for 0.1% of time when you have 100 or 1000 samples).