过滤包含在 EF Core 中

Question

I'm trying to filter on the initial query. I have nested include leafs off a model. I'm trying to filter based on a property on one of the includes. For example:

using (var context = new BloggingContext())
{
    var blogs = context.Blogs
        .Include(blog => blog.Posts)
            .ThenInclude(post => post.Author)
        .ToList();
}

How can I also say .Where(w => w.post.Author == "me") ?

Answer 1

Entity Framework core 5 is the first EF version to support filtered Include .

How it works

Supported operations:

• Where
• OrderBy(Descending)/ThenBy(Descending)
• Skip
• Take

Some usage examples (from the original feature request and the github commmit ) :

Only one filter allowed per navigation, so for cases where the same navigation needs to be included multiple times (eg multiple ThenInclude on the same navigation) apply the filter only once, or apply exactly the same filter for that navigation.

context.Customers
    .Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => o.Name != "Foo")).ThenInclude(o => o.OrderDetails)
    .Include(c => c.Orders).ThenInclude(o => o.Customer)

or

context.Customers
    .Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => o.Name != "Foo")).ThenInclude(o => o.OrderDetails)
    .Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => o.Name != "Foo")).ThenInclude(o => o.Customer)

Another important note:

Collections included using new filter operations are considered to be loaded.

That means that if lazy loading is enabled, addressing one customer's Orders collection from the last example won't trigger a reload of the entire Orders collection.

Also, two subsequent filtered Include s in the same context will accumulate the results. For example...

context.Customers.Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => !o.IsDeleted))

...followed by...

context.Customers.Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => o.IsDeleted))

...will result in customers with Orders collections containing all orders.

Filtered Include and relationship fixup

If other Order s are loaded into the same context, more of them may get added to a customers.Orders collection because of relationship fixup . This is inevitable because of how EF's change tracker works.

context.Customers.Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => !o.IsDeleted))

...followed by...

context.Orders.Where(o => o.IsDeleted).Load();

...will again result in customers with Orders collections containing all orders.

The filter expression

The filter expression should contain predicates that can be used as a stand-alone predicate for the collection. An example will make this clear. Suppose we want to include orders filtered by some property of Customer :

context.Customers.Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => o.Classification == c.Classification))

It compiles, but it'll throw a very technical runtime exception, basically telling that o.Classification == c.Classification can't be translated because c.Classification can't be found. The query has to be rewritten using a back-reference from Order to Customer :

context.Customers.Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => o.Classification == o.Customer.Classification))

The predicate o => o.Classification == o.Customer.Classification) is "stand alone" in the sense that it can be used to filter Orders independently:

context.Orders.Where(o => o.Classification == o.Customer.Classification) // No one would try 'c.Classification' here

This restriction may change in later EF versions than the current stable version (EF core 5.0.7).

What can (not) be filtered

Since Where is an extension method on IEnumerable it's clear that only collections can be filtered. It's not possible to filter reference navigation properties. If we want to get orders and only populate their Customer property when the customer is active, we can't use Include :

context.Orders.Include(c => c.Customer.Where( ... // obviously doesn't compile

Filtered Include vs filtering the query

Filtered Include has given rise to some confusion on how it affects filtering a query as a whole. The rule of the thumb is: it doesn't.

The statement...

context.Customers.Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => !o.IsDeleted))

...returns all customers from the context, not only the ones with undeleted orders. The filter in the Include doesn't affect the number of items returned by the main query.

On the other hand, the statement...

context.Customers
    .Where(c => c.Orders.Any(o => !o.IsDeleted))
    .Include(c => c.Orders)

...only returns customers having at least one undeleted order, but having all of their orders in the Orders collections. The filter on the main query doesn't affect the orders per customer returned by Include .

To get customers with undeleted orders and only loading their undeleted orders, both filters are required:

context.Customers
    .Where(c => c.Orders.Any(o => !o.IsDeleted))
    .Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => !o.IsDeleted))

Filtered Include and projections

Another area of confusion is how filtered Include and projections ( select new { ... } ) are related. The simple rule is: projections ignore Include s, filtered or not. A query like...

context.Customers
    .Include(c => c.Orders)
    .Select(c => new { c.Name, c.RegistrationDate })

...will generate SQL without a join to Orders . As for EF, it's the same as...

context.Customers
    .Select(c => new { c.Name, c.RegistrationDate })

It gets confusing when the Include is filtered, but Orders are also used in the projection:

context.Customers
    .Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => !o.IsDeleted))
    .Select(c => new 
    { 
        c.Name, 
        c.RegistrationDate,
        OrderDates = c.Orders.Select(o => o.DateSent)
    })

One might expect that OrderDates only contains dates from undeleted orders, but they contain the dates from all Orders . Again, the projection completely ignores the Include . Projection and Include are separate worlds.

How strictly they lead their own lives is amusingly demonstrated by this query:

context.Customers
    .Include(c => c.Orders.Where(o => !o.IsDeleted))
    .Select(c => new 
    { 
        Customer = c, 
        OrderDates = c.Orders.Select(o => o.DateSent)
    })

Now pause for a moment and predict the outcome...

The not so simple rule is: projections don't always ignore Include . When there is an entity in the projection to which the Include can be applied, it is applied. That means that Customer in the projection contains its undeleted Orders , whereas OrderDates still contains all dates. Did you get it right?

Answer 2

Not doable.

There is an on-going discussion about this topic: https://github.com/aspnet/EntityFramework/issues/1833

I'd suggest to look around for any of the 3rd party libraries listed there, ex.: https://github.com/jbogard/EntityFramework.Filters

Answer 3

You can also reverse the search.

{
    var blogs = context.Author
    .Include(author => author.posts)
        .ThenInclude(posts => posts.blogs)
    .Where(author => author == "me")
    .Select(author => author.posts.blogs)
    .ToList();
}

Answer 4

Not sure about Include() AND ThenInclude(), but it's simple to do that with a single include:

var filteredArticles = 
    context.NewsArticles.Include(x => x.NewsArticleRevisions)
    .Where(article => article.NewsArticleRevisions
        .Any(revision => revision.Title.Contains(filter)));

Hope this helps!

Answer 5

Although it's (still in discussion) not doable with EF Core, I've managed to do it using Linq to Entities over EF Core DbSet. In your case instead of:

var blogs = context.Blogs
        .Include(blog => blog.Posts)
            .ThenInclude(post => post.Author)
        .ToList()

.. you'll have:

await (from blog in this.DbContext.Blogs
           from bPost in blog.Posts
           from bpAuthor in bPost.Author
           where bpAuthor = "me"
           select blog)
.ToListAsync();

Answer 6

I used below package Use Z.EntityFramework.Plus

IncludeFilter and IncludeFilterByPath two methods are which you can use.

var list = context.Blogs.IncludeFilter(x => x.Posts.Where(y => !y.IsSoftDeleted))
                .IncludeFilter(x => x.Posts.Where(y => !y.IsSoftDeleted)
                    .SelectMany(y => y.Comments.Where(z => !z.IsSoftDeleted)))
                .ToList();

Here is the example https://dotnetfiddle.net/SK934m

Or you can do like this

GetContext(session).entity
                .Include(c => c.innerEntity)
                .Select(c => new Entity()
                {
                    Name = c.Name,
                    Logo = c.Logo,
                    InnerEntity= c.InnerEntity.Where(s => condition).ToList()
                })

Answer 7

Interesting case and it worked!!

If you have table/model user(int id, int? passwordId, ICollection<PwdHist> passwordHistoryCollection) where collection is history of passwords. Could be many or none.

And PwdHistory(int id, int UserId, user User) . This has a quasi relationship via attributes.

Needed to get user , with related current password record, while leaving historical records behind.

User user = _userTable
    .Include(u => u.Tenant)
    .Include(u => u.PwdHistory.Where(p => p.Id == p.PwdUser.PasswordId)) 
    .Where(u => u.UserName == userName)
    .FirstOrDefault();

Most interesting part is .Include(u => u.PwdHistory.Where(p => p.Id == p.PwdUser.PasswordId))

• works with user and many passwords
• works with user and no passwords
• works with no user

Answer 8

We can use by extension

public static IQueryable<TEntity> IncludeCondition<TEntity, TProperty>(this IQueryable<TEntity> query, Expression<Func<TEntity, TProperty>> predicate, bool? condition) where TEntity : class where TProperty : class
{
    return condition == true ? query.Include(predicate) : query;
}

Usage;

_context.Tables.IncludeCondition(x => x.InnerTable, true)

Answer 9

This task can be accomplished with two queries. For example:

var query = _context.Employees
            .Where(x =>
                x.Schedules.All(s =>
                    s.ScheduleDate.Month != DateTime.UtcNow.AddMonths(1).Month &&
                    s.ScheduleDate.Year != DateTime.UtcNow.AddMonths(1).Year) ||
                (x.Schedules.Any(s =>
                     s.ScheduleDate.Month == DateTime.UtcNow.AddMonths(1).Month &&
                     s.ScheduleDate.Year == DateTime.UtcNow.AddMonths(1).Year) &&
                 x.Schedules.Any(i => !i.ScheduleDates.Any())));

        var employees = await query.ToListAsync();

        await query.Include(x => x.Schedules)
            .ThenInclude(x => x.ScheduleDates)
            .SelectMany(x => x.Schedules)
            .Where(s => s.ScheduleDate.Month == DateTime.UtcNow.AddMonths(1).Month &&
                        s.ScheduleDate.Year == DateTime.UtcNow.AddMonths(1).Year).LoadAsync();

Answer 10

I didn't see the simple answer above -- not knocking the other answers. The most popular is inclusive for just about any use case.

C# 9, EF Core 6, was able to do this:

                .Include(i => string.Join(", ", i.ApplicablePids.OrderBy(x =>x.CompareTo(i.ApplicablePids))))

I'm new to all this fluent LINQ stuff -- did I miss something here?

Answer 11

The easiest inline solution to this I have used would be something like:

using (var context = new BloggingContext())
{
    var blogs = context.Blogs
        .Include(blog => blog.Posts)
            .ThenInclude(post => post.Author)
        .FromSql("Select b.* from Blogs b inner join Posts p on b.BlogId = p.BlogId where p.Author = 'me'")
        .ToList();
}