[英]C++17 structured binding declaration in for vs if vs while?
When I compile this code: 当我编译这段代码时:
std::tuple<int, int> array[] = {std::make_tuple(1, 2), std::make_tuple(1, 2),
std::make_tuple(1, 2), std::make_tuple(1, 2)};
for (auto[a, b] : array) {
printf("%u %u", a, b);
}
if (auto[a, b] = std::forward_as_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff) {
printf("%u %u", a, b);
}
while (auto[a, b] = std::make_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff) {
printf("%u %u", a, b);
}
With: 带有:
clang++ -std=c++1z
I get the following errors: 我收到以下错误:
main2.cpp:76:14: error: decomposition declaration not permitted in this context
while (auto[a, b] = std::make_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff) {
^~~~~~
main2.cpp:76:46: error: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
while (auto[a, b] = std::make_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff) {
^
2 errors generated.
Why is auto[a, b] = std::forward_as_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff
为什么auto[a, b] = std::forward_as_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff
auto[a, b] = std::forward_as_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff
supported in an if
but not in a while
? auto[a, b] = std::forward_as_tuple(1, 2); b != 0xff
if
在一段while
? Is there some technical reason or is it a "that's just the way it is" reason? 是否存在某种技术原因,还是“这就是事实”的原因?
According to the latest draft standard for C++, the while
loop does not in fact have an optional init-statement
the kind that if
and switch
gained in C++17. 根据最新的C ++标准草案, while
循环实际上没有可选的init-statement
,它是if
和switch
在C ++ 17中获得的。
The formal syntax is: 正式语法为:
while ( condition ) statement
In conclusion, the structured binding is not the issue here. 总之,结构化绑定不是这里的问题。 Check this segment of the draft for reference. 检查草稿的此部分以供参考。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.