简体   繁体   English

分析线性同余发生器是错误的吗?

[英]Analysis of Linear congruential generator is wrong?

So in an attempt to better understand MSVC++'s implementation of rand , I re-implemented it and attempted to better understand it (and LCGs in general I guess). 因此,为了更好地理解MSVC ++的rand实现,我重新实现了它,并试图更好地理解rand (我想大概是LCG)。

My implementation (which matches MSVC++'s almost exactly) is as follows: 我的实现(几乎与MSVC ++完全匹配)如下:

// vc++ impl. of random
// Xn+1 = (aXn + i) mod m
// a = 214013, i = 2531011, m = 32768
unsigned int seed = 0;
unsigned int random()
{
    seed = seed * 214013L + 2531011L;
    // return (seed/(1<<16)) % 32768; (equiv to below)
    return seed>>16 & 0x7FFF;
}

To find the difference in the newly generated seeds from 2 seeds, I figured it would just be (214013*h) % 2^32 where h is the difference between the 2 initial seeds. 为了找出2个种子中新生成的种子之间的差异,我计算出这只是(214013*h) % 2^32 ,其中h是2个初始种子之间的差异。 Using this same logic I figured the difference between 2 randomly generated numbers given the initial seed as x and the next seed as x+h , I took this different in seed, divided it by 2^16 (or shifted it right 16 bits), and got rid of the most significant bit. 使用相同的逻辑,我计算出在给定初始种子为x和下一个种子为x+h ,随机产生的两个数字之间的差,我将其取为2 ^ 16(或右移16位)除以种子的不同,并摆脱了最重要的部分。

The values this yields seem to be correct except in some cases, for example when x = 100 and h = 5000. 除非在某些情况下(例如,当x = 100且h = 5000时),否则此得出的值似乎是正确的。

Here's the entire code: 这是完整的代码:

#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>

// vc++ impl. of random
// Xn+1 = (aXn + i) mod m
// a = 214013, i = 2531011, m = 32768
unsigned int seed = 0;
unsigned int random()
{
    seed = seed * 214013L + 2531011L;
    return seed>>16 & 0x7FFF;
}

int main()
{
    // f(x) = (214013x + 2531011) mod 2^32 [LCG]
    // g(x) = floor(f(x)/2^16) mod 2^15 [RND]
    // h(x) = f(x + h) - f(x) ?= 214013*h mod 2^32
    // j(x) = g(x + h) - g(x) ?= 214013*h/2^16 mod 2^15

    // x: initial seed
    // h: displaecment to next seed (next seed: x + h)
    // a, b: first and second randomly generated values using C rand
    // c, d: first and second randomly generated values using random
    // newSeedA, newSeedB: seed generated from LCG after x and x + h respectively
    // diffExp: experimental difference in random values
    // diffCalc: calculated/theoretical difference in random vlaues
    unsigned int x = 100, h = 50000;
    unsigned int a, b, c, d;
    unsigned int newSeedA, newSeedB;
    int diffExp, diffCalc;

    srand(x);
    seed = x;
    a = rand();
    c = random();
    newSeedA = seed;

    srand(x + h);
    seed = x + h;
    b = rand();
    d = random();
    newSeedB = seed;

    diffExp = (d - c) % 32768;
    diffCalc = (214013*h)>>16 & 0x7FFF;


    std::cout << "RANDOM VALUES\n";
    std::cout << "  VC++ rand: " << a << ", " << b << "\n";
    std::cout << "Custom rand: " << c << ", " << d << "\n";
    std::cout << "\n";

    std::cout << "DIFFERENCE IN SEED\n";
    std::cout << "Experimental Difference: " << (newSeedB - newSeedA) << "\n";
    std::cout << "  Calculated Difference: " << (static_cast<unsigned int>(214013)*h) << "\n";
    std::cout << "\n";

    std::cout << "DIFFERENCE IN VALUES\n";
    std::cout << "Experimental Difference: " << diffExp << "\n";
    std::cout << "  Calculated Difference: " << diffCalc << "\n";
    std::cout << "\n";
    return 0;
}

However with these values, the estimated difference between the 2 randomly generated values is 1 less than the actual difference. 但是,使用这些值,两个随机生成的值之间的估计差异比实际差异小1。 Am I doing something obviously wrong? 我做错了什么吗?

The difference between the new seeds is indeed 214013*h . 新种子之间的差异确实为214013*h

That gives the seeds s and s + 214013*h , the difference between the resulting random outputs would be (before simplification) diff = ((s + 214013*h >> 16) & 0x7fff) - ((s >> 16) & 0x7fff) . 得出种子ss + 214013*h ,结果随机输出之间的差为(简化之前) diff = ((s + 214013*h >> 16) & 0x7fff) - ((s >> 16) & 0x7fff) The question is then essentially, is this expression independent of s . 那么本质上的问题是,该表达式是否独立于s

It is not. 它不是。 For example, even taking h = 1 , diff can be either 3 (eg s = 0 ) or 4 (eg s = 0x0000bc03 ). 例如,即使取h = 1diff也可以是3(例如s = 0 )或4(例如s = 0x0000bc03 )。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM