如何在没有powermock的情况下模拟静态方法

Question

Is there any way we can mock the static util method while testing in JUnit?

I know Powermock can mock static calls, but I don't want to use Powermock.

Are there any alternatives?

Answer 1

(I assume you can use Mockito though) Nothing dedicated comes to my mind but I tend to use the following strategy when it comes to situations like that:

1) In the class under test, replace the static direct call with a call to a package level method that wraps the static call itself:

public class ToBeTested{

    public void myMethodToTest(){
         ...
         String s = makeStaticWrappedCall();
         ...
    }

    String makeStaticWrappedCall(){
        return Util.staticMethodCall();
    }
}

2) Spy the class under test while testing and mock the wrapped package level method:

public class ToBeTestedTest{

    @Spy
    ToBeTested tbTestedSpy = new ToBeTested();

    @Before
    public void init(){
        MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
    }

    @Test
    public void myMethodToTestTest() throws Exception{
       // Arrange
       doReturn("Expected String").when(tbTestedSpy).makeStaticWrappedCall();

       // Act
       tbTestedSpy.myMethodToTest();
    }
}

Here is an article I wrote on spying that includes similar case, if you need more insight: sourceartists.com/mockito-spying

Answer 2

When you have static code that gives you trouble in your unit tests; so that you feel you have to "mock it away", you have exactly these options:

• You turn to PowerMock(ito). Works fine.
• You turn to JMockit. Works fine, too.
• If you are testing code you have written yourself , you might want to step back and ask yourself: "why did I write code that I now find hard to unit test?"

In other words: if you want to use a mocking framework, you have to use one of those listed above. On the one side, that is absolutely fair. static is one part of the Java language; so why not use a framework that allows you to deal with it?

But of course: you still have the static call in your production code then. Leading to tight coupling, and preventing polymorphism .

So: if you can get rid of the static call (even when just using the workaround suggested in the other answer) - all the better. If not: Mockito can't help; you need the magic of byte code manipulation resp. JVM agents.

Answer 3

You can use Mockito (since version 3.4.0 ) to mock static methods.

Given a class Foo :

class Foo{
  static String method() {
    return "foo";
  }
}

This is the test:

@Test
void testMethod() {
    assertEquals("foo", Foo.method());
    try (MockedStatic mocked = Mockito.mockStatic(Foo.class)) {
        mocked.when(Foo::method).thenReturn("bar");
        assertEquals("bar", Foo.method());
        mocked.verify(Foo::method);
    }
    assertEquals("foo", Foo.method());
}

This requires the dependency org.mockito:mockito-inline:3.4.0 or newer version.

Answer 4

I've had a lot of luck with doing something similar to what Maciej suggested in his answer above. In Java8 I like to wrap those static methods with functional interfaces to make them more straightforward to inject or mock. For example:

public class MyClass {
    private MyStaticWrapper staticWrapper;

    public MyClass(final MyStaticWrapper staticWrapper) {
        this.staticWrapper = staticWrapper;
    }

    public void main() {
        ...
        staticWrapper.doSomething();
        ...    
    }
}    

public interface MyStaticWrapper {
    default void doSomething() {
      Util.annoyingUntestableStaticFunction();
    }
}