简体   繁体   English

计划语言中的递归调用

[英]Recursive call in Scheme language

I am reading sicp, there's a problem (practice 1.29), I write a scheme function to solve the the question, but it seems that the recursive call of the function get the wrong answer. 我正在阅读sicp,有一个问题(练习1.29),我编写了一个scheme函数来解决该问题,但似乎该函数的递归调用得到了错误的答案。 Really strange to me. 对我来说真的很奇怪。 The code is following: 代码如下:

(define simpson
  (lambda (f a b n)
    (let ((h (/ (- b a) n))
          (k 0))
      (letrec
          ((sum (lambda (term start next end)
                  (if (> start end)
                      0
                      (+ (term start)
                         (sum term (next start) next end)))))
           (next (lambda (x)
                   (let ()
                     (set! k (+ k 1))
                     (+ x h))))
           (term (lambda (x)
                   (cond
                     ((= k 0) (f a))
                     ((= k n) (f b))
                     ((even? k) (* 2
                                   (f x)))
                     (else (* 4
                              (f x)))))))
        (sum term a next b)))))

I didn't get the right answer. 我没有得到正确的答案。

For example, if I try to call the simpson function like this: 例如,如果我尝试像这样调用simpson函数:

(simpson (lambda (x) x) 0 1 4)

I expected to get the 6, but it returned 10 to me, I am not sure where the error is.It seems to me that the function "sum" defined inside of Simpson function is not right. 我希望得到6,但是它又返回了10,我不确定错误在哪里。在我看来,Simpson函数内部定义的函数“ sum”不正确。

If I rewrite the sum function inside of simpson using the iteration instead of recursive, I get the right answer. 如果我使用迭代而不是递归的方式在辛普森内部重写sum函数,那么我会得到正确的答案。

您需要将总和乘以h/3

 (* 1/3 h (sum term a next b))

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM