如何从两个不同的连接工厂加入Spring JMS事务？

Question

I am using different connection factories for sending and receiving messages, having trouble with partial commit issues incase of delivey failures. jms:message-driven-channel-adapter uses the receiveConnectionFactory ro receive the messages from the queue. jms:outbound-channel-adapter uses the deliverConnectionFactory to send the messages multiple to downstream queues. We have only one JmsTransactionManager which uses the receiveConnectionFactory and the jms:outbound-channel-adapter configured with session-transacted="true" .

<beans>
    <bean id="transactionManager"
        class="org.springframework.jms.connection.JmsTransactionManager">
        <property name="connectionFactory" ref="receiveConnectionFactory" />
    </bean>
    <bean id="receiveConnectionFactory"
        class="org.springframework.jms.connection.CachingConnectionFactory">
        <property name="targetConnectionFactory">
            <bean class="com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory">
                <property name="hostName" value="${mq.host}" />
                <property name="channel" value="${mq.channel}" />
                <property name="port" value="${mq.port}" />
            </bean>
        </property>
        <property name="sessionCacheSize" value="${receive.factory.cachesize}" />
        <property name="cacheProducers" value="${receive.cache.producers.enabled}" />
        <property name="cacheConsumers" value="${receive.cache.consumers.enabled}" />
    </bean>

    <bean id="deliverConnectionFactory"
        class="org.springframework.jms.connection.CachingConnectionFactory">
        <property name="targetConnectionFactory">
            <bean class="com.ibm.mq.jms.MQQueueConnectionFactory">
                <property name="hostName" value="${mq.host}" />
                <property name="channel" value="${mq.channel}" />
                <property name="port" value="${mq.port}" />
            </bean>
        </property>
        <property name="sessionCacheSize" value="${send.factory.cachesize}" />
        <property name="cacheProducers" value="${send.cache.producers.enabled}" />
        <property name="cacheConsumers" value="${send.cache.consumers.enabled}" />
    </bean>

    <tx:advice id="txAdviceNew" transaction-manager="transactionManager">
        <tx:attributes>
            <tx:method name="send" propagation="REQUIRES_NEW" />
        </tx:attributes>
    </tx:advice>

    <aop:config>
        <aop:advisor advice-ref="txAdviceNew" pointcut="bean(inputChannel)" />
        <aop:advisor advice-ref="txAdviceNew" pointcut="bean(errorChannel)" />
    </aop:config>

    <jms:message-driven-channel-adapter
        id="mdchanneladapter" channel="inputChannel" task-executor="myTaskExecutor"
        connection-factory="receiveConnectionFactory" destination="inputQueue"
        error-channel="errorChannel" concurrent-consumers="${num.consumers}"
        max-concurrent-consumers="${max.num.consumers}" max-messages-per-task="${max.messagesPerTask}"
        transaction-manager="transactionManager" />

    <jms:outbound-channel-adapter
        connection-factory="deliverConnectionFactory" session-transacted="true"
        destination-expression="headers.get('Deliver')" explicit-qos-enabled="true" />
</beans>

When there is MQ exception on any one destination, the partial commit occurs and then the failure queue commit happens. I am looking to see if I am missing some configuration to join the transactions so that the partial commit never happens.

I tried with only one connection factory for both send and receive ( receiveConnectionFactory ) and the parital commit is not happening, everything works as expected.

Answer 1

I tried with only one connection factory for both send and receive ( receiveConnectionFactory ) and the parital commit is not happening, everything works as expected.

That's the right way to go in your case.

I see that your two ConnectionFactories are only different by their objects. Everything rest looks like the same target MQ server.

If you definitely can't live with only one ConnectionFactory , you should consider to use JtaTransactionManager or configure org.springframework.data.transaction.ChainedTransactionManager for two JmsTransactionManagers - one per connection factory.

See Dave Syer's article on the matter: https://www.javaworld.com/article/2077963/open-source-tools/distributed-transactions-in-spring--with-and-without-xa.html