程序集引导程序不会跳转到内核

Question

I have made a basic bootloader in assembly, but it doesn't actually jump to the kernel. It just says "Booting...". I'm sure it's just some silly mistake I made, like jumping to the wrong place. It should show an output like "Booting... Loaded!". I've also tried setting es to 0 before loading it, but even that doesn't work. Here's my code:

mov ax, 9ch
mov ss, ax
mov sp, 4096d
mov ax, 7c0h
mov ds, ax
mov es, ax

xor ah, ah
int 13h

clc

mov si, msg2
call print

mov ah, 02h
xor ax, ax
mov es, ax
mov bx, 0x7E00
mov al, 1h
mov ch, 0
mov cl, 2h
mov dh, 0
int 13h

jc error

jmp 0x7E00

mov si, msg3
call print

error:
mov si, msg
call print
hlt

print:
lodsb
cmp al, 0
jz done
mov ah, 0eh
int 10h
jmp print
done:
ret

msg db "An error occured!!", 0
msg2 db "Booting...", 0
msg3 db "Did not jump to kernel correctly!"

times 510-($-$$) db 0
dw 0xAA55

mov si, msgloaded
call printl
jmp $

printl:
lodsb
cmp al, 0
jz donel
mov ah, 0eh
int 10h
jmp print
donel:
ret

msgloaded db "Loaded!", 0

times 0x400-($-$$) db 0

All help is appreciated. I will credit anyone who can help me. Thanks!

Answer 1

For high level languages there's lots of clues about what the programmer intended contained in the structure loops, how variable names were chosen, defines/enums, etc; and it's easy to write maintainable code without comments.

For assembly language there's no well chosen variable names and no variable types (eg ax doesn't tell the reader if it's a pointer to a string or a giraffe's height or ...), instructions often don't show the intent (eg lea might be used to multiply by a constant and might not be used to load an effective address), control flow is far more flexible (eg something like a do(condition1) { } while(condition2) is perfectly fine) and goto (both jmp and conditional branches like jc ) are used a lot.

For this reason, well written/maintainable assembly language uses lots of comments. More specifically, you'd use comments on the right hand side to describe your intentions. This allows you to check if the intentions are correct by reading comments, and then check if the intention is implemented correctly by comparing the instruction on each line with it's comment. It makes it much easier to avoid bugs, and much easier to find bugs.

Here's the first half of your code with comments:

;Memory Layout
;
; 0x009C:0x1000 = 0x000019C0 = stack top
; 0x07C0:0x0000 = 0x00007C00 = load address
; 0x0000:0x7E00 = 0x00007E00 = kernel address

%define STACK_SEGMENT      0x009C
%define STACK_TOP_OFFSET   0x1000
%define LOAD_SEGMENT       0x07C0
%define KERNEL_SEGMENT     0x0000
%define KERNEL_OFFSET      0x7E00

;_______________________________________________

;Entry point
;
;Input
; dl = BIOS boot device number

    mov ax, STACK_SEGMENT
    mov ss, ax
    mov sp, STACK_TOP_OFFSET
    mov ax, LOAD_SEGMENT
    mov ds, ax
    mov es, ax

;Reset disk system
;
;Note: This should be completely unnecessary. We know the BIOS
;      disk services are working correctly and don't need
;      to be reset because the BIOS just used it successfully
;      to load this code into memory.

    xor ah, ah            ;ah = BIOS "reset disk system" function number
    int 13h               ;Call BIOS disk services
    clc                   ;Unnecessary

;Display welcome message

    mov si, msg2
    call print

;Load kernel from disk
; dl = BIOS boot device number

    mov ah, 02h           ;ah = BIOS "read sectors" function number
    xor ax, ax            ;ax = KERNEL_SEGMENT
    mov es, ax
    mov bx, KERNEL_OFFSET ;es:bx = address to load kernel
    mov al, 1h            ;al = number of sectors to read
    mov ch, 0             ;ch = cylinder number for first sector
    mov cl, 2h            ;cl = sector number for first sector
    mov dh, 0             ;dh = head number for first sector
    int 13h               ;Call BIOS disk services

    jc error              ;Handle error if there was one

;Pass control to "kernel"

    jmp KERNEL_SEGMENT:KERNEL_OFFSET

Here's the part that makes your bug obvious:

                          ;ah = BIOS "read sectors" function number
                          ;ax = KERNEL_SEGMENT

Essentially, if you commented your code properly, you would've noticed that loading KERNEL_SEGMENT into ax overwrites the BIOS function number (which was in the highest 8 bits of ax ). This causes this piece of code to call the BIOS "reset disk system" function and not load anything from disk at all. When it jumps to where the kernel should've been loaded (but wasn't) later, that memory is probably still full of zeros because it hasn't been used, but memory full of zeros are decoded as add instructions by the CPU, so the CPU happily executes the add instructions for ages.

Note: There is another (unrelated) bug - your code to print strings uses lodsb which depends on the direction flag; but you don't do a cld instruction to set the direction flag, so depending on the (undefined) state the BIOS left this flag in, it could print garbage instead.