打字稿+ Jasmine / Mocha，但没有全局类型？

Question

I want to use a testing framework such as Jasmine or Mocha. However, doing so means adding their @types libraries via npm, and unfortunately these pollute the global namespace.

This means that when writing application code, intelisense contains testing functions, granted this is the most first world problem ever but it is still annoying to me.

I was hoping I could import the libraries at the top of each *.spec.ts file, but the definition files do not appear to support modules.

I found another library called Tape which uses module exports, however it is fairly basic and does not have a browser UI for the tests (they appear in the browser console).

Has anyone got any suggestions?

Answer 1

One possible solution may be to add "types": [] to the tsconfig.json that compiles your application. Some of my projects are structured like this:

• src contains the application code and has a tsconfig.json for compiling the application,

• test contains test code and has a tsconfig.json appropriate for testing.

If the two files need to share configuration, I have a top-level tsconfig-base.json that the two other configuration files extend through "extends": "../tsconfig-base" .

When I have a project structured like the above, just adding "types": [] to my src/tsconfig.json is enough to hide the Mocha globals from the application code. Note that some projects will need to list at least some packages instead of having an empty array. Initially, I thought that I would have to list in "types" each and every package my application uses, but that's not the case because, as stated in the documentation :

Specify "types": [] to disable automatic inclusion of @types packages.

Keep in mind that automatic inclusion is only important if you're using files with global declarations (as opposed to files declared as modules). If you use an import "foo" statement, for instance, TypeScript may still look through node_modules & node_modules/@types folders to find the foo package.

Emphasis added.

Important caveat: some project structures can make it impossible to fix the issue by just using "types" . I have a project structured differently from what I describe above. I'd have to refactor the build process for that project to be able to hide Mocha from the application files just by adding an appropriate value for "types" .