执行for循环非常慢

Question

I am populating a spreadhsheet from data I am getting from an external endpoint. Everything is working, but the execution of the for...in loop is incredibly slow.

The object that I am getting back from UrlFetchApp is quite large; Object.keys().length > 1500 , so perhaps it could just be the size of the object.

I am curious if there is a way to optimize my function.

Code:

    var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
    function getData() {
      var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(endpoint);
      var data = JSON.parse(response);
      var rates = data["quotes"];
      var max = Object.keys(rates).length;
      var row = 2;
      var i = 0;
      clear(); //clears the range A2:B
      for (var key in rates) {
        sh.getRange("A" + (i+row)).setValue(key.substring(3));
        sh.getRange("B" + (i+row)).setValue(rates[key]);
        i++
        if (i+1 === max) {
          //do something after complete
        }
      }
    }

Answer 1

I was not sure about //do something after complete . So how about these 2 patterns. Please think of this answer as one of several answers.

I modified your script to replace setValue() to setValues() . By this, the process speed will be fast.

Pattern 1 :

function getData1() {
  var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
  var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(endpoint);
  var data = JSON.parse(response);
  var rates = data["quotes"];

  var keys = Object.keys(rates);
  var dat = [];
  keys.forEach(function(key){
    if (key != keys[keys.length - 1]) {
      dat.push([key.substring(3), rates[key]]);
    } else {
      //do something after complete
    }
  });
  sh.getRange(2, 1, dat.length, dat[0].length).setValues(dat);
}

Pattern 2 :

function getData2() {
  var sh = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSheet();
  var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(endpoint);
  var data = JSON.parse(response);
  var rates = data["quotes"];

  var dat = Object.keys(rates).map(function(key){return [key.substring(3), rates[key]]});
  sh.getRange(2, 1, dat.length, dat[0].length).setValues(dat);

  //do something after complete
}

Note :

• If this didn't work, can you provide a sample data from var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch(endpoint); ? Of course, please remove the private information from it.

Refecences :

• setValue(value)
• setValues(values)
• Best Practices

If I misunderstand your question, I'm sorry.

Answer 2

The problem is not with the size of your object. You are repeatedly calling sheet.getRange() to get every individual cell in the target range which is redundant. Keep read/process/write operations completely separate from each other to optimize performance. 1) Retrieve values 2) Process them, and 3) Call 'setValues()' on the target range. This took less than 0.2 seconds to finish:

 var arr = [];

  for (var [prop, val] in hugeObject) {

    arr.push([prop, val]);  

  }

  var targetRange = SpreadsheetApp.getActive()
                                  .getSheets()[0]
                                  .getRange(2, 1, arr.length, arr[0].length)
                                  .setValues(arr);