我可以在C＃中为匿名类指定有意义的名称吗？

Question

We all know that when we create an anonymous class like this:

var Employee = new { ID = 5, Name= "Prashant" };

...at run time it will be of type:

<>f__AnonymousType0<int,string>

Is there any way to specify a meaningful name to such classes?

Answer 1

public class Employee {}

\n

Answer 2

It's an anonymous type, that defeats the purpose. Those objects are designed to be temporary. Hell, the properties are even read-only.

Sorry, I'm being a smart-ass. The answer is no, there is no way to tell the compiler what name to use for an anonymous type.

In fact, the names of the types generated by the compiler use illegal characters in their naming so that you cannot have a name collision in your application.

Answer 3

public class Employee {
    public int ID { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
}

Then use the following syntax

var employee = new Employee { ID = 5, Name = "Prashant" };

Answer 4

Make it a regular class with a name?

public class Employee
{
    public int ID;
    public string Name;
}


var Employee = new Employee { ID = 5, Name= "Prashant" };

Answer 5

Actually, if you're not afraid of getting extremely nitty gritty, you could use TypeBuilder to build your own runtime type based on your anonymous type, which will allow you to specify a name for the type. Of course, it is much easier to just declare a class as almost everyone else in this thread suggested, but the TypeBuilder way is far more exciting. ;)

TypeBuilder

Answer 6

Java World中的答案是本地类 （在方法中定义），在C＃中不存在。

Answer 7

是的，您正在创建一个匿名类 ，如果您希望您的类具有名称，即Not Anonymous ，则声明一个常规类或结构。

Answer 8

Since it's anonymous, you cannot name it. If you need to know the name of a type, then you must really create a class.

Answer 9

No, there is no way to give a meaningful type name to these classes as you've declared them. Anonymous Types are just that, anonymous. There is no way to explicitly "name" the type in code without resorting to very ugly hacks.

If you really need to give the type a name you will need to explicitly declare and use a new type with the properties you need.

Answer 10

I think that, by definition, Anonymous Types can't have a name, just that which the compiler gives it. If you're looking for more meaningful design-time information on Anonymous Types then you're expecting too much from the compiler.