[英]Using es6 spread without Object.assign
I'm not a big fan of Object.assign, in my opinion, it is hard to read and not elegant, I try to avoid it. 我不是Object.assign的忠实拥护者,我认为它很难阅读且不美观,我尝试避免使用它。 Somewhere I saw this in redux reducer
我在redux reducer中看到的这个地方
case ADD_TODO:
return Object.assign({}, state, {
todos: [
...state.todos,
{
text: action.text
}
]
})
Just curious is Object assign looks good above? 只是好奇对象分配在上面看起来不错吗? Why not just do this instead?
为什么不这样做呢?
case ADD_TODO:
return {
...state,
todos: [
...state.todos,
{
text: action.text
}
]
}
Why not just do this instead?
为什么不这样做呢?
Because it's not valid ES6 anymore. 因为它不再是有效的ES6。
The object rest/spread syntax proposal had been around for some time but only was accepted for ES2018. 对象剩余/扩展语法建议已经存在了一段时间,但仅在ES2018中被接受。 See here for details.
有关详细信息,请参见此处 。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.