简体   繁体   English

如何用打字稿描述简单的Just函子的接口?

[英]How to describe the interface of a simple Just functor in typescript?

I'm trying to write a simple interface in typescript for the first time and having doubts about pretty much everything. 我试图第一次用打字稿编写一个简单的界面,并对几乎所有内容都有疑问。

The question is simple. 问题很简单。 How to describe this simple jest matcher extension? 如何描述这个简单的玩笑匹配器扩展?

/**
 * @param {*} v Any value
 */
function just (v) {
  return {
    fmap: f => just(f(v))
  }
}

expect.extend({
  /** Compare the two values inside two functors with Object.is
   * @method
   * @augments jest.Matchers
   * @param {*} actual The functor you want to test.
   * @param {*} expected The functor you expect.
   */
  functorToBe(actual, expected) {
    const actualValue = getFunctorValue(actual)
    const expectedValue = getFunctorValue(expected)
    const pass = Object.is(actualValue, expectedValue)
    return {
      pass,
      message () {
        return `expected ${actualValue} of ${actual} to ${pass ? '' : 'not'} be ${expectedValue} of ${expected}`
      }
    }
  }
})

test('equational reasoning (identity)', () => {
  expect(just(1)).functorToBe(just(1))
})

I have tried this but not sure about the generic types at all: 我已经尝试过了,但是根本不确定泛型类型:

import { Matchers } from 'jest'

interface Functor<T> {
  (value?: any): {
    fmap: (f: value) => Functor<T>
  }
}

interface Matchers<R> {
  functorToBe(actual: Functor<T>, expected:  Functor<T>): R
}

Ref: JSDoc document object method extending other class 参考: 扩展其他类的JSDoc文档对象方法

The gist of the jest type definition for Matchers<R> : Matchers<R>的笑话类型定义的要点:

/**
 * The `expect` function is used every time you want to test a value.
 * You will rarely call `expect` by itself.
 */
interface Expect {
    /**
     * The `expect` function is used every time you want to test a value.
     * You will rarely call `expect` by itself.
     *
     * @param actual The value to apply matchers against.
     */
    <T = any>(actual: T): Matchers<T>;
    /**
     * You can use `expect.extend` to add your own matchers to Jest.
     */
    extend(obj: ExpectExtendMap): void;
    // etc.
}

Well, this is confusing. 好吧,这令人困惑。 The only index.d.ts in the jest repo is https://github.com/facebook/jest/blob/master/packages/jest-editor-support/index.d.ts but that is not the one I get in vscode, which is https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/master/types/jest/index.d.ts#L471 . 笑话回购中唯一的index.d.tshttps://github.com/facebook/jest/blob/master/packages/jest-editor-support/index.d.ts,但这不是我能得到的vscode,它是https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/blob/master/types/jest/index.d.ts#L471

The extension 扩展名

Your merge of Matchers is almost right, but from looking at the jest types on Definitely Typed [1], I can see that Matchers is nested inside a jest namespace. 您对Matchers合并几乎是正确的,但是通过查看Definitely Typed [1]上的jest类型,我可以看到Matchers嵌套在jest名称空间内。 The part of the Typescript handbook that covers this is namespace merging . Typescript手册涵盖这一部分的部分是名称空间合并

namespace jest {
    export interface Matchers<R> {
        functorToBe<T>(actual: Functor<T>, expected:  Functor<T>): R;
    }
}

When I tested this, I needed a tsconfig.json to get my JS files to see the declaration: 当我对此进行测试时,我需要一个tsconfig.json来获取我的JS文件以查看声明:

{
    "compilerOptions": {
        "allowJs": true,
        "checkJs": true,
    },
    "include": [
        "test.js",
        "extensions.ts",
    ]
}

A jsconfig.json is almost the same thing, but doesn't require you to add "allowJs": true explicitly. jsconfig.json几乎是同一件事,但是不需要您添加"allowJs": true显式为"allowJs": true But note that adding a tsconfig or jsconfig will turn off automatic downloads of types from Definitely Typed, and you'll have to manually npm install @types/jest (plus any other types for libraries you use). 但是请注意,添加tsconfig或jsconfig会关闭从“确定类型”中自动下载类型,并且您必须手动npm install @types/jest (以及您使用的库的其他任何类型)。 If you don't want to add a tsconfig, I was able to manually add a reference in the JS file as the first line: 如果您不想添加tsconfig,则可以在JS文件中手动添加引用作为第一行:

/// <reference path="./extensions.ts" />

The type of the new method 新方法的类型

It should be something like: 应该是这样的:

functorToBe(expected: R): R;

Here is where things get confusing to me. 这是让我感到困惑的地方。 Let me know if you have questions about this part of the problem and I will try to help. 如果您对问题的这一部分有疑问,请告诉我,我将尽力提供帮助。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM