为什么Spring的@Transactional在没有代理的情况下工作？

Question

I got interested in how Spring's @Transactional works internally, but everywhere I read about it there's a concept of proxy. Proxies are supposed to be autowired in place of real bean and "decorate" base method with additional transaction handling methods. The theory is quite clear to me and makes perfect sense so I tried to check how it works in action. I created a Spring Boot application with a basic controller and service layers and marked one method with @Transactional annotation. Service looks like this:

public class TestService implements ITestService {

@PersistenceContext
EntityManager entityManager;

@Transactional
public void doSomething() {
    System.out.println("Service...");
    entityManager.persist(new TestEntity("XYZ"));
}}

Controller calls the service:

public class TestController {

@Autowired
ITestService testService;

@PostMapping("/doSomething")
public ResponseEntity addHero() {
    testService.doSomething();
    System.out.println(Proxy.isProxyClass(testService.getClass()));
    System.out.println(testService);
    return new ResponseEntity(HttpStatus.OK);
}}

The whole thing works, new entity is persisted to the DB but the whole point of my concern is the output:

Service...
false
com.example.demo.TestService@7fb48179

It seems that the service class was injected explicitly instead of proxy class. Not only "isProxy" returns false, but also the class output ("com.example.demo.TestService@7fb48179") suggests its not a proxy.

Could you please help me out with that? Why wasn't the proxy injected, and how does it even work without proxy? Is there any way I can "force" it to be proxied, and if so - why the proxy is not injected by default by Spring ?

There's not much to be added, this is a really simple app. Application properties are nothing fancy either :

spring.datasource.driver-class-name=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
spring.datasource.username=root
spring.datasource.password=superSecretPassword
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/heroes?serverTimezone=UTC
spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto=create-drop

Thank you in advance!

Answer 1

Your understanding is correct, but your test is flawed:

When the spring docs say "proxy", they are referring to the pattern, not a particular implementation. Spring supports various strategies for creating proxy objects. One of these is the java.lang.reflect.Proxy you tested for, but by default spring uses a more advanced technique that generates a new class definition at runtime that subclasses the actual implementation class of the service (and overrides all methods to apply transaction advice). You can see this in action by checking testService.getClass() , which will refer to that generated class, or by halting execution in a debugger, and inspecting the fields of targetService .

The reason that toString() refers to the original object is that the proxy implements toString() by delegating to its target object, which uses its class name to build the String .