简体   繁体   English

使用UNAuthorizationStatus.provisional时,如何编写使用Xcode 9.x(iOS11)和Xcode10.x(iOS12)编译的代码?

[英]How can I write code that compiles with Xcode 9.x(iOS11) and Xcode10.x(iOS12) when using UNAuthorizationStatus.provisional?

Hello I have some switch case code that handles UNAuthorizationStatus, since iOS12 a new status has been added: .provisional . 您好,我有一些处理UNAuthorizationStatus的switch case代码,因为iOS12已添加新状态: .provisional In C or other old style compiler stuff I would write a precompiler directive to surround .provisional handling code however in swift that seems to lead to errors. 在C或其他旧式编译器中,我会编写一个预编译器指令来包围.provisional处理代码,但是这种处理似乎会导致错误。

private func checkNotificationSettings() {
    UNUserNotificationCenter.current().getNotificationSettings { settings in
        switch settings.authorizationStatus {
        if #available(iOS 12.0, *) { // ERROR here
        case .provisional: // ERROR here too
            // Do my thing
        }
        case .authorized:
            // Do my thing
        case .notDetermined:
            // Request authorization and if granted do my thing
        case .denied:
            // Do not do my thing
        }
    }
}

Errors: 错误:

Switch must be exhaustive 开关必须详尽无遗
All statements inside a switch must be covered by a 'case' or 'default' 开关内的所有语句必须用“ case”或“ default”覆盖

Is there any smart way of handling this? 有什么聪明的方法可以解决这个问题吗? I would like to avoid this because it is too long and repetitive: 我想避免这种情况,因为它太长且重复:

if #available(iOS 12.0, *) {
    NUserNotificationCenter.current().getNotificationSettings { settings in 
        switch settings.authorizationStatus {
        case .provisional:
        ...
    }
} else {
    NUserNotificationCenter.current().getNotificationSettings { settings in 
        switch settings.authorizationStatus {
        ...
    }
}

You could do all common cases as normal and add the available checks in the default part like this 您可以像往常一样处理所有常见情况,并在默认部分中添加可用的检查,如下所示

NUserNotificationCenter.current().getNotificationSettings { settings in 
    switch settings.authorizationStatus {
        case .stateX:
         //do stuff
        default:
          if #available(iOS 12.0, *) {
               if settings.authorizationStatus == .provisional {
                //Handle case
               }
          }
    }
}

This isn't the most elegant solution, but it's simple to use if else instead of switch . 这不是最优雅的解决方案,但是if else使用if else而不是switch ,则使用起来很简单。 In my case I remap .provisional to .authorized . 在我来说,我重新映射.provisional.authorized Something like: 就像是:

func didTapNotificationsCell(authorizationStatus: UNAuthorizationStatus) {
    if #available(iOS 12.0, *), authorizationStatus == .provisional {
        handleCommonStatus(.authorized)
    } else {
        handleCommonStatus(authorizationStatus)
    }
}

private func handleCommonStatus(_ status: UNAuthorizationStatus) {
    if status == .authorized {
        // Do something

    } else if status == .notDetermined {
        UNUserNotificationCenter.current().requestAuthorization(options: [.alert, .badge, .sound]) { (_, _) in
        }

    } else if status == .denied {

    }
}

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM