[英]Is it a good practice to repeatedly use struct in C?
Suppose I have these two structs coming from different header files: 假设我有两个结构来自不同的头文件:
header_1.h
header_1.h
struct main_node {
struct *sec_node
}
header_2.h
header_2.h
struct sec_node {
int var;
}
Now I am using this both header files in main.c
and the code looks something like this: 现在我在
main.c
使用这两个头文件,代码看起来像这样:
#include <stdio.h>
#include "header_1.h"
#include "header_2.h"
struct main_node *node;
void main()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
printf( "%d\n", node->sec_node->var) ;
}
Let's assume, I am not using a modern optimizing compiler. 我们假设,我没有使用现代优化编译器。 I'm looping over this
struct
many times, would it be faster/good practice to use a temp variable here? 我多次循环这个
struct
,在这里使用临时变量会更快/更好吗?
Is there any difference performance-wise in C? 在C中,性能方面有什么不同吗?
void main()
{
int temp = node->sec_node->var;
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
printf( "%d\n", temp);
}
It's not bad , but it can be a source of optimization bottleneck. 它并不坏 ,但它可能是优化瓶颈的来源。 Because the compiler cannot see the definitions of external functions (like
printf
here, although it might know about its properties as a builtin because it's a standard function), it must assume any external function could modify any non- const
object whose address it could see. 因为编译器无法看到外部函数的定义(比如
printf
,虽然它可能知道它的属性是内置函数,因为它是一个标准函数),但它必须假设任何外部函数都可以修改任何非const
对象,它的地址可以看到。 As such, in your example, node
or node->sec_node
may have a different value before and after the call to the external function. 因此,在您的示例中,
node
或node->sec_node
在调用外部函数之前和之后可能具有不同的值。
One way to mitigate this is with temps like you're doing, but you can also make use of the restrict
keyword as a promise to the compiler that, during the lifetime of the restrict
-qualified pointer, the pointed-to object will not be accessed except via pointers "based on" the restrict
-qualified one. 缓解这种情况的一种方法是使用像你一样的临时值,但你也可以使用
restrict
关键字作为编译器的一个承诺,在restrict
限定指针的生命周期中,指向对象不会是除了通过指向“基于” restrict
指针访问。 How to do this is probably outside the scope of this question. 如何做到这一点可能超出了这个问题的范围。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.