简体   繁体   English

互斥体实际上没有被释放吗?

[英]Mutex not actually being released?

I have a web api controller that I want to restrict it to run only once at a time. 我有一个Web API控制器,我想限制它一次只能运行一次。 If a new request comes I want it to be rejected and not queued. 如果有新请求,我希望它被拒绝而不是排队。 I've implemented this behaviour using a Mutex, like in the following code: 我已经使用Mutex实现了此行为,如以下代码所示:

public IHttpActionResult Get()
{
    string token = Utils.GetCurrentToken(RequestContext);
    //Some irrelevant code

    Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
    {
        var mutexName = Utils.GetDBFromToken(token).ProjectID.ToString();

        var success = Mutex.TryOpenExisting(mutexName, out Mutex mutex);
        if (!success || mutex == null)
        {
            mutex = new Mutex(true, mutexName);
            Utils.Log(token, mutexName + " - Mutex created");
        }
        else
        {
            Utils.Log(token, mutexName + " - Mutex exists");
            return;
        }

        try
        {
            mutex.WaitOne();

            try
            {
                Utils.Log(token, mutexName + " - Job started");
                Thread.Sleep(10000);
                Utils.Log(token, mutexName + " - Job ended");
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                //Handle error
            }
        }
        finally
        {
            Utils.Log(token, mutexName + " - About to release mutex");
            if (mutex != null)
            {
                mutex.ReleaseMutex();
                mutex.Close();
                mutex.Dispose();
                Utils.Log(token, mutexName + " - Mutex released");
            }
        }
    });

    return Ok();
}

Now if I call the controller 3 times in success, I get the following logs, which is exactly what I expected: 现在,如果我成功调用控制器3次,则会得到以下日志,这正是我的预期:

2018-10-26 11:45:11.650 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - Mutex created
2018-10-26 11:45:11.870 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - Mutex exists
2018-10-26 11:45:11.963 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - Mutex exists
2018-10-26 11:45:12.323 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - Job started
2018-10-26 11:45:22.633 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - Job ended
2018-10-26 11:45:22.947 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - About to release mutex
2018-10-26 11:45:23.290 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - Mutex released

But if I call it once more after release and close has been called, I just get 但是,如果我在释放并关闭后再次调用它,我会得到

2018-10-26 11:46:35.133 d6e4dd2e-16f1-43aa-b34b-226187dd9185 - Mutex exists

Shouldn't TryOpenExisting fail after mutex has been released? 互斥量释放后, TryOpenExisting是否应该失败? Am I doing something wrong? 难道我做错了什么?

Rather than use a Mutex , you should consider Monitor.TryEnter instead. 不要使用Mutex ,而应该考虑使用Monitor.TryEnter

It functions like lock , but returns immediately (as you want) if the lock is already taken. 它的功能类似于lock ,但是如果已经获取了lock ,则会立即(根据需要)返回。

To do this, you will need to declare a static lock object: 为此,您需要声明一个static锁对象:

private static object lockObject;

Or, if you need multiple locks (eg per database) then you would store those locks in a: 或者,如果您需要多个锁(例如,每个数据库),则可以将这些锁存储在以下位置:

private static ConcurrentDictionary<string, object> lockObjects = new ConcurrentDictionary<string, object>();

getting the lock object using GetOrAdd . 使用GetOrAdd获取锁对象。

Also, this will not work if you are using a web farm / web garden / load balancer either (since the lock will be process specific). 另外,如果您使用的是Web Farm / Web Garden / Load Balancer,则此方法不起作用(因为锁定将是特定于进程的)。 If this is an issue for you, I'd consider using a queue - whereby every web server adds entries to the queue and a single queue consumer pulls off the queue and de-dupes the requests. 如果这对您来说是个问题,我会考虑使用队列 -每个Web服务器都会向该队列中添加条目,而单个队列使用方会拉出该队列并对请求进行重复数据删除。

Do you really need logic around whether the Mutex exists or not? 您是否真的需要有关Mutex是否存在的逻辑?

Why not always use var mutex = new Mutex(true, mutexName); 为什么不总是使用var mutex = new Mutex(true, mutexName); ? You don't HAVE to check whether it exists or not. 您无需检查它是否存在。 And that check of Mutex.TryOpenExisting isn't threadsafe either. 而且对Mutex.TryOpenExisting检查Mutex.TryOpenExisting是线程安全的。

EDIT 编辑

One more question, do you need a Mutex here, will a LOCK not be sufficient? 还有一个问题,您在这里需要Mutex吗,LOCK不够吗? Are you planning on running multiple instances of this WebAPI on the same server? 您是否打算在同一服务器上运行此WebAPI的多个实例? If not, then a Lock should be sufficient. 如果没有,那么一个锁应该足够了。

Mutex - Work across Processes Mutex跨流程工作

Lock - Work across Threads Lock -跨线程工作

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM