简体   繁体   English

如何使用Map在java中创建递归的树状数据结构 <String, T> ?

[英]How to create recursive tree-like data structure in java using Map<String, T>?

I have a mind-block when trying to create data-structure that follows the pattern: 在尝试创建遵循模式的数据结构时,我有一个思维模块:

Map<String, T> is a main building block and T is either Map<String, T> or as terminal operator List<String> . Map<String, T>是主要构建块, TMap<String, T>或者是终端运算符List<String> Is it possible to build anything similar in Java , this idea comes from functional languages like F# or Haskell -like. 是否有可能在Java构建类似的东西,这个想法来自F#Haskell类的函数式语言。

I searched SO but so far couldn't find anything that match my idea in Java . 我搜索了SO但到目前为止找不到任何符合我的想法的Java

Yes: you can do something like this: 是的:你可以这样做:

public abstract class T {
...
}
public class NonTerminal extends T {
    private Map<String,T> map = new HashMap<>();
...
}
public class Terminal extends T {
    private List<String> list;
---
}

Recreating functional programming stuff in Java isn't really a good idea (at least not in Java 8, I don't know about Java 11). 在Java中重新创建函数式编程并不是一个好主意(至少在Java 8中,我不了解Java 11)。

You can do something like this: 你可以这样做:

class EitherMapOrList {
    private Map<String, EitherMapOrList> map;
    private List<String> list;

    public EitherMapOrList(Map<String, EitherMapOrList> map) {
        this.map = map;
    }

    public EitherMapOrList(List<String> list) {
        this.list = list;
    }
    // you can remove the optionals here and use null directly.
    public Optional<Map<String, EitherMapOrList>> getMap() {
        return Optional.ofNullable(map);
    }

    public Optional<List<String>> getList() {
        return Optional.ofNullable(list);
    }
}

And then create a Map<String, EitherMapOrList> . 然后创建一个Map<String, EitherMapOrList>

But I would imagine it would be a pain to use this thing in Java. 但我想在Java中使用这个东西会很痛苦。

You could use just a single Map<String, KeyOrValue> where the value could be a marker interface with two implementations 您可以只使用一个Map<String, KeyOrValue> ,其中值可以是具有两个实现的标记接口

interface KeyOrValue {}

class Key implements KeyOrValue {
    private String key;
}

class Value implements KeyOrValue {
    private List<String> values;
}

You could then just create a lookup method which recursivly calls itself and then returns the value once it has reached the end: 然后,您可以创建一个recursivly调用自身的查找方法,然后在到达结尾时返回该值:

private final Map<String, KeyOrValue> map = ...

public List<String> getValues(String key) {
    KeyOrValue keyOrValue = map.get(key);
    if(keyOrValue instanceof Key) {
        // is a key, so use recursion to get the value
        key = ((Key) keyOrValue).key;
        return getValues(key);
    } else if(keyOrValue instanceof Value) {
        // is a value, so just return the value it holds
        return ((Value) keyOrValue).values;
    } else {
        // no mapping was found for "key"
        return null;
    }
}

You could do the same without recursion too: 你也可以在没有递归的情况下做同样的事情:

public List<String> getValues(String key) {
    KeyOrValue keyOrValue;
    List<String> values = null;
    do {
        keyOrValue = map.get(key);
        if(keyOrValue instanceof Key) {
            // is a key, so iterate further
            key = ((Key) keyOrValue).key;
        } else if(keyOrValue instanceof Value) {
            // is a value, so get the values out and set the key to null to break the loop
            values = ((Value) keyOrValue).values;
            key = null;
        }
    } while(key != null);

    // return the values, may be null due to nothing being found
    return values;
}

The marker interface is not really needed though, you can get the same outcome if you just use Map<String, Object> where the value could either be a String or a List<String> and then the instanceof checks would have to be adapted too, but I like the approach the way with an interface more 但是,实际上并不需要标记接口,如果只使用Map<String, Object> ,则可以得到相同的结果Map<String, Object>其中值可以是StringList<String> ,然后也必须调整instanceof检查,但我更喜欢interface的方式

If you want to translate haskell 如果你想翻译haskell

data Map a = Branch { key :: String, value :: a, left :: Map a, right :: Map a} | MapNul

to java you can go with: 你可以去java:

class Map<T> {
    String key;
    T value;
    Map<T> left;
    Map<T> right;
} 

you do not need MapNul in java because you can use null instead of it. 你不需要在java中使用MapNul ,因为你可以使用null而不是它。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM