（C＃，WPF）在本地保存ResourceDictionary

Question

everyone!

I post a request for help here because I'm blocked.

I made a translation system using Resource Dictionaries for keys and values. Nothing to complicate.

Except now I would like to save my Dictionaries locally, (at the launch of the software) so on the disk in a .XAML file.

The problem is that I can't find a way to save them

Here is a resource dictionary that I would like to save:

<ResourceDictionary xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
                xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
                xmlns:sys="clr-namespace:System;assembly=mscorlib">

<!-- General -->
<sys:String x:Key="LanguageName">en</sys:String>
<sys:String x:Key="LanguageDisplayName">English</sys:String></ResourceDictionary>

Thanks & have a good day! And sorry for my approximate English, I am French :x

Answer 1

Yes of course you can write files to disk. And yes you can then later read them back in to re-create a resource dictionary.

I'm not clear how the user receives what you're showing us.

If it's as a compiled resource dictionary you can instantiate that and then write it to disk using XamlWriter.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.windows.markup.xamlwriter?view=netframework-4.7.2

Or you could read a "flat" uncompiled xaml file off a web server and save it to appdata.

An odd thing about resource dictionaries.

The same syntax you use to merge a resource dictionary will work with an uncompiled .xaml file.

https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/28797.wpf-dynamic-xaml.aspx#Loading_a_Flat_File_as_a_Resource_Dictionary

You can alternatively xamlreader.load() a flat .xaml file and create a resource dictionary in memory that you then merge in code.

You can manipulate uncompiled xaml files as strings or treat them as xml. Some of the samples in the link do that.

And you can receive a resource dictionary as a string from a service and xamlreader.parse() that into a resource dictionary in memory. That you can then merge in code.

BTW

Your English seems fine to me.