[英]Assigning a string in a char * array to another char * array
I am trying to convert the hex values in array a to binary values and assign converted values to array b then print the array b. 我试图将数组a中的十六进制值转换为二进制值,并将转换后的值分配给数组b,然后打印数组b。 But all values in array b are same. 但是数组b中的所有值都相同。 The output is: 输出为:
111100001011000100010111101010001101 111100001011000100010111101010001101 111100001011000100010111101010001101
If I use b[i] = strdup(hexToBin(a[i]));
如果我使用b[i] = strdup(hexToBin(a[i]));
instead of b[i] = hexToBin(a[i]);
而不是b[i] = hexToBin(a[i]);
the output will be: 输出将是:
111100001011 111100001011000100010111 111100001011000100010111101010001101
Is this something about pointers? 这与指针有关吗? Char * is a pointer which points first character of the string and are all characters after the pointer printed? 字符*是一个指针,它指向字符串的第一个字符,并且该指针后的所有字符都被打印吗? What is right way of doing this? 正确的做法是什么?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
char bin[100] = "";
char * hexToBin(char hex[50]);
int main(void) {
char * a[] = {
"f0b",
"117",
"a8d",
};
char * b[3];
for(int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
b[i] = hexToBin(a[i]);
}
for(int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
printf("%s\n", b[i]);
}
}
char * hexToBin(char hex[50]) {
for(int i=0; hex[i]!='\0'; i++)
{
switch(hex[i])
{
case '0':
strcat(bin, "0000");
break;
case '1':
strcat(bin, "0001");
break;
case '2':
strcat(bin, "0010");
break;
case '3':
strcat(bin, "0011");
break;
case '4':
strcat(bin, "0100");
break;
case '5':
strcat(bin, "0101");
break;
case '6':
strcat(bin, "0110");
break;
case '7':
strcat(bin, "0111");
break;
case '8':
strcat(bin, "1000");
break;
case '9':
strcat(bin, "1001");
break;
case 'a':
case 'A':
strcat(bin, "1010");
break;
case 'b':
case 'B':
strcat(bin, "1011");
break;
case 'c':
case 'C':
strcat(bin, "1100");
break;
case 'd':
case 'D':
strcat(bin, "1101");
break;
case 'e':
case 'E':
strcat(bin, "1110");
break;
case 'f':
case 'F':
strcat(bin, "1111");
break;
default:
printf("Invalid hexadecimal input.");
}
}
return bin;
}
The hexToBin
function returns a pointer to the first element of the global bin
array. hexToBin
函数返回一个指向全局bin
数组第一个元素的指针。 Everytime! 每次! . 。
That means all pointers in b
will be the very same pointer to the very same first element of the bin
array. 这意味着b
所有指针将是指向bin
数组中相同的第一个元素的完全相同的指针。
If you know the maximum length of the strings, I recommend that you make b
an array of arrays of char
. 如果您知道字符串的最大长度,建议您将b
组成char
数组 。 For example 例如
char b[3][500]; // 3 arrays of 499-character strings (+1 for the null-terminator)
Then instead of hexToBin
returning a pointer to a single global array, pass a pointer to the string to be filled as argument to hexToBin
: 然后,不将hexToBin
返回指向单个全局数组的指针, hexToBin
将指向要填充的字符串的指针作为hexToBin
参数hexToBin
:
void hexToBin(char *hex, char *bin);
and call it as 并称其为
hexToBin(a[i], b[i]);
You only have one bin
. 您只有一个bin
。 What your hexToBin
does is appending to that one bin
and then returning that bin
. 您的hexToBin
所做的是将其附加到该bin
,然后返回该bin
。 In other words, when you call it multiple times, the result is always the same pointer, because you always return bin;
换句话说,当您多次调用它时,结果始终是相同的指针,因为您总是return bin;
. 。
So if you do this: 因此,如果您这样做:
b[i] = hexToBin(a[i]);
Then in the end, all elements of b
are pointing to bin
, that's why you get the same output when you print them. 最后, b
所有元素都指向bin
,这就是为什么在打印它们时会得到相同的输出。 If you do this instead: 如果您改为这样做:
b[i] = strdup(hexToBin(a[i]));
Then the result is not the same, because they all don't get bin
assigned, but a copy of what bin
has been at that time. 然后结果是不一样的,因为它们都没有分配bin
,而是当时有bin
的副本。 That's why the results are different. 这就是为什么结果不同的原因。 So b[0]
points to one copy, then bin
is appended to again, but that doesn't change the b[0]
copy. 因此, b[0]
指向一个副本,然后将bin
再次附加到该副本,但这不会更改b[0]
副本。
If you use strdup
, don't forget to free the memory it allocated: 如果使用strdup
,请不要忘记释放它分配的内存:
for(int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
free(b[i]);
}
[My answer is mistaken. [我的回答是错误的。 I leave it posted here for reference but the other answers are preferable.] 我将其保留在此处以供参考,但其他答案更可取。]
Your code looks pretty good for beginner's code and I like your style. 您的代码对于初学者的代码看起来相当不错,我喜欢您的风格。 I especially like this line: 我特别喜欢这条线:
char * b[3];
Unfortunately, for this particular application, you must replace this with a less elegant line like 不幸的是,对于这个特定的应用程序,您必须用不太优雅的线条代替它,例如
char b[3][5];
The former line reserves no storage for your output. 前一行不会为您的输出保留任何存储空间。 The latter line reserves five bytes per hex digit. 后一行每十六进制保留五个字节。 You need storage, somehow. 您需要某种方式的存储空间。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.