简体繁体 English

Git push Refspecs：`refs / heads / ：refs / heads / origin`与`refs / heads / ：refs / heads / *`

[英]Git push Refspecs: `refs/heads/*:refs/heads/origin` vs `refs/heads/*:refs/heads/*`

原文 2019-06-12 12:30:29 0 1 git/ refspec/ git-refspec

Which push Refspec (Git) is correct? 哪个推送Refspec（Git）是正确的？ Or both are correct? 还是两者都正确？ What is the difference? 有什么区别？

refs/heads/*:refs/heads/origin/*
refs/heads/*:refs/heads/*

I prefer (1) because it references remote name (origin), and I don't understand what (2) means (but I see it used in some manuals!). 我更喜欢（1），因为它引用了远程名称（来源），而且我不明白（2）的含义（但是我在某些手册中看到了它的用法！）。

1 个解决方案

With refs/heads/*:refs/heads/origin/* , git push origin master would be expanded to git push origin refs/heads/master:refs/heads/origin/master . 使用refs/heads/*:refs/heads/origin/* ， git push origin master将扩展为git push origin refs/heads/master:refs/heads/origin/master 。 It will create or update a branch named origin/master in the remote repository. 它将在远程存储库中创建或更新一个名为origin/master的分支。 It's valid, but refs/heads/origin/master would be ambiguous with refs/remotes/origin/master . 这是有效的，但是refs/heads/origin/master与refs/remotes/origin/master可能是不明确的。 In some situations, it might cause errors. 在某些情况下，它可能会导致错误。

The 2nd is valid. 第二个有效。 With remote.origin.push=refs/heads/*:refs/heads/* , git push is expanded to git push origin refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master refs/heads/dev:refs/heads/dev , and git push origin master to git push origin refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master . 使用remote.origin.push=refs/heads/*:refs/heads/* ， git push扩展为git push origin refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master refs/heads/dev:refs/heads/dev ，和git push origin master到git push origin refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master 。