[英]php reference concept with array
How &`` symbol works for arrays in PHP? &``符号如何在PHP中用于数组?
When I execute below code 当我执行以下代码
<?php
$cfg=array();
$curpath=array();
$name="check";
array_push($curpath, strtolower($name));
$ptr =& $cfg;
/*what happens here*/
$ptr =& $ptr[$name];
print("\ncfg\n");
print_r($cfg);
?>
Output below after execution of above code: 执行以上代码后,输出如下:
cfg
Array ( [check] => )
Please explain below statements 请解释以下声明
$ptr = &$cfg;
/*what happens here*/
$ptr =& $ptr[$name];
Here, the &
means that the array is assigned by reference. 在这里,
&
表示该数组是通过引用分配的。 This means that instead of copying the values from $cfg
to $ptr
, both of these actually refer to the exact same array. 这意味着,不是将值从
$cfg
复制到$ptr
,这两个实际上都指向完全相同的数组。 If you modify the array using $ptr
, you will see those changes when you access the array using $cfg
. 如果使用
$ptr
修改阵列,则使用$cfg
访问阵列时将看到这些更改。 Likewise, if you modify the array using $cfg
, you will see the changes when you access it with $ptr
. 同样,如果使用
$cfg
修改数组,则使用$ptr
访问该数组时将看到更改。
Without the &
in $ptr = &$cfg;
$ptr = &$cfg;
不带&
, the values of $cfg
would be copied to $ptr
. ,则
$cfg
的值将被复制到$ptr
。 In that case, you would have two completely different arrays. 在这种情况下,您将拥有两个完全不同的阵列。 Then, changes to
$ptr
would not be reflected in $cfg
and vice versa. 这样,对
$ptr
更改将不会反映在$cfg
,反之亦然。
For example, if we have: 例如,如果我们有:
$cfg = ["item 1" => 1, "item 2" => 2];
$ptr = &$cfg;
$ptr["item 1"] = 999;
echo $cfg["item 1"];
echo $ptr["item 1"];
The output will be: 输出将是:
999 999 999 999
But if you change $ptr = &$cfg
to $ptr = $cfg
, then the output will be: 1 999 但是,如果将
$ptr = &$cfg
更改$ptr = &$cfg
$ptr = $cfg
,则输出将为:1 999
The original $cfg remains unmodified in the second case. 在第二种情况下,原始$ cfg保持不变。
Your example does not really make sense to me but lets see: 您的示例对我而言真的没有任何意义,但让我们看看:
$config = array();
$currentPath = array();
// you pushed "check" into the end of the $currentPath array
$name = "check";
array_push($currentPath, strtolower($name));
echo "currentPath:\r\n";
var_dump($currentPath);
// array (
// 0 => 'check',
// )
echo "config:\r\n";
var_dump($config);
// array(0) {
// }
// $ptr (pointer) is actually a reference.
// you now have a $reference to $config.
// (btw it should be written $foo = &$bar and NOT $foo =& $bar)
$reference = &$config;
// "what happens here"
// $reference is empty. so $reference["check"] does not exist.
// you create an offset "check" at $reference, so at $config.
// (i have no idea how - if somebody know why please let me know)
$reference = &$reference[$name];
// what happen here is
// - offset $config["check"] created
// - the reference of $config["check"] has been assigned to $reference (overwritten previous $reference var)
echo "config:\r\n";
var_dump($config);
// array(1) {
// ["check"]=>
// &NULL
// }
// $reference points now to $config["check"], so ...
$reference = 123;
// should set $config["check"] to 123
echo "config:\r\n";
var_dump($config);
// array(1) {
// ["check"]=>
// &int(123)
// }
A more "realistic" example could be: 一个更“现实”的示例可能是:
// empty config
$config = array();
// ...
// create config offset "check" with default value NULL
$name = 'check';
$config[$name] = null;
// ...
var_dump($config);
// array(1) {
// ["check"]=>
// NULL
// }
// using a reference to $config["check"] (for w/e reasons)
$check = &$config[$name];
// ...
// update $config["check"]
$check = 123;
var_dump($config);
// array(1) {
// ["check"]=>
// &int(123)
// }
unset($check); // release reference
var_dump($config);
// array(1) {
// ["check"]=>
// int(123)
// }
@all Why does PHP creates the offset $config["check"]
when executing $reference = &$reference[$name];
@all为什么在执行
$reference = &$reference[$name];
时PHP创建偏移量$config["check"]
$reference = &$reference[$name];
? ? And shouldnt PHP bring up a undefined index notice?
PHP是否应该显示未定义的索引通知?
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.