简体   繁体   English

在Ruby中找到第二个最长的数组-Collat​​z猜想算法

[英]Finding the 2nd longest array in Ruby - Collatz conjecture algorithm

The Collatz conjecture: Collat​​z猜想:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collat​​z_conjecture

For any positive integer n we define two rules: if even: divide by two if odd: multiply by three, then add one, and repeat until the result is the number 1. The smallest value of n is 1. 对于任何正整数n,我们定义两个规则:if:偶数:除以2:odd:乘以3,然后加一,然后重复直到结果为数字1。n的最小值为1。

This will generate sequences of numbers like below, converging to 1: 这将生成如下所示的数字序列,收敛为1:

6, 3, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 6,3,10,5,16,8,4,2,1

For each number n we can now count the number of steps in this sequence until we reach 1. 现在,对于每个数字n,我们都可以计算此序列中的步数,直到达到1。

So the sequence above, starting with 6, has a length of 9 (including the starting point and the final one). 因此,以上从6开始的序列的长度为9(包括起点和终点)。

My problem: 我的问题:

I am trying to find the second-longest sequence of all the integers smaller or equal than 10 million. 我试图找到所有小于或等于1000万的整数的第二长序列。 How would you go about it? 你会怎么做?

So far I came up with a solution for finding the longest sequence, but I am not sure how to find the 2nd. 到目前为止,我想出了找到最长序列的解决方案,但是我不确定如何找到第二个序列。

def collatz_sequence_eval(n)
  array_sequence = []
  until n == 1
    if n%2 != 0
        n = 3*n + 1
        array_sequence.push(n)
      else
        n = n/2
        array_sequence.push(n)
    end
  end
  return array_sequence
end

def collatz_iterator
  counter = 1
  current_longest_sequence = []
  until counter == 10000000
    cur_seq = collatz_sequence_eval(counter)
    if cur_seq.length > current_longest_sequence.length
      current_longest_sequence = cur_seq
      counter+=1
    else
      counter+=1
    end
  end
    puts "Starting number is #{current_longest_sequence[0]}.
    Sequence length is #{current_longest_sequence.length}"
end
def collatz(n)
  seq = [n]
  until n == 1
    n = n.even? ? n/2 : 3*n + 1
    seq << n
  end
  seq
end

(2..10**7).reduce([[],[]]) do |(longest, next_longest), n|
  seq = collatz(n)
  seq_size = seq.size
  if seq_size > longest.size
    [seq, longest]
  elsif seq_size < longest.size && seq_size > next_longest.size
    [longest, seq]
  else
    [longest, next_longest]
  end
end
  #=> [[8400511, 25201534, 12600767, 37802302, 18901151, 56703454, 
  #     ...
  #     106, 53, 160, 80, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1
  #    [8865705, 26597116, 13298558, 6649279, 19947838, 9973919,
  #     ...
  #     17, 52, 26, 13, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1]]

By changing the final end to end.map(&:size) , [686, 668] is returned, meaning the longest sequence(s) had length 686 , the next longest(s), 668 . 通过将最end更改为end.map(&:size) ,返回[686, 668] end.map(&:size) [686, 668] ,这意味着最长的序列的长度为686 ,下一个最长的序列为668

The length of the longest sequence appears consistent with results given in the Wiki , which states that for n < 10^7 685 "steps" are required. 最长序列的长度似乎与Wiki中给出的结果一致,该结果指出对于n < 10^7 685 ,需要“步骤”。

226 seconds were required to perform this calculation when using Linux on a Pixelbook with a 1.2GHz 7th generation i5. 在带有1.2GHz第七代i5的Pixelbook上使用Linux时,执行此计算需要226秒。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM