双工模式下名为 pipe 的 Win32 的行为

Question

Trying to read and write through a named pipe between a single server and single client without overlapped mode. Two threads are being run for read and write separately. My understanding as per the documentation is, a single connection will have both in and out buffer. So I should be able to read and write parallely with a single instance of pipe. Have written a simple test code to write from server to client in a loop. The moment the read thread on server calls ReadFile, the write thread gets stuck at WriteFile. Could someone explain what is the behavior in this case?

Documentation says " The pipe server should not perform a blocking read operation until the pipe client has started ". But the blocking ReadFile is being done after the client starts receiving data from the write thread.

Update 1: I understand that the ReadFile is blocking the WriteFile here. But I am looking for Microsoft's documentation which has the explanation for this behavior. Any links to that would be much appreciated.

Answer 1

The moment the read thread on server calls ReadFile, the write thread gets stuck at WriteFile.

A pipe is referenced by two kernel file objects (see FILE_OBJECT ), one at each end of the pipe. On the server side, CreateNamedPipe internally calls the native system function NtCreateNamedPipeFile , which in the kernel calls IoCreateFile with CreateFileType passed as CreateFileTypeNamedPipe .

Each file object may be opened for either synchronous or asynchronous I/O . (Asynchronous I/O is also referred to as overlapped I/O.) The I/O mode is determined by the presence of the FO_SYNCHRONOUS_IO flag in the file object. If the flag is set, the I/O mode is synchronous. Otherwise the I/O mode is asynchronous.

For synchronous mode, the I/O manager serializes all I/O operations on the file object. Concurrent I/O operations on the file in other threads will block (ie wait to begin) until the current operation has completed. Even querying the file name (also an I/O operation) will block. (This is a known problem for system-level tools such as Sysinternals handle.exe. This can block if we try to query the pipe name while the system is waiting for a synchronous read to complete.)

Using several threads (eg read in one thread, write in another) does not help here at all. Asynchronous I/O is ideal here. It's more efficient (fewer threads) and never deadlocks.

---

The native NT API and Windows API use different options to specify the I/O mode.

The NT API (eg NtCreateFile , NtCreateNamedPipeFile ) by default assumes asynchronous mode. Using synchronous mode requires a particular create option, as discussed in the documentation:

The FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_ALERT and FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_NONALERT CreateOptions flags, which are mutually exclusive as their names suggest, specify that all I/O operations on the file will be synchronous—as long as they occur through the file object referred to by the returned FileHandle. All I/O on such a file is serialized across all threads using the returned handle.

With either create option, the FO_SYNCHRONOUS_IO flag is set in the file object. FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_ALERT additionally sets the FO_ALERTABLE_IO flag.

The Windows API (eg CreateFileW , CreateNamedPipeW , CreatePipe ) by default assumes synchronous I/O mode. For this it passes the NT create option FILE_SYNCHRONOUS_IO_NONALERT when calling underlying NT API functions. The Windows API flag FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED overrides the default to request asynchronous I/O mode.