简体   繁体   English

为什么 std::array size_t 和 std::vector 中的 size_type 通常是 size_t?

[英]Why is size_type in std::array size_t and in std::vector usually size_t?

The documentation says, that size_type of std::vector is /usually/ size_t , which is reasonable, since an implementation can choose to use different.文档说, std::vectorsize_type是 /通常/ size_t ,这是合理的,因为实现可以选择使用不同的。

But why is size_type = size_t in std::array .但是为什么std::array中的size_type = size_t Especially here, as std::array is used on small µC a lot, it would be better to let the implemenatation have some freedom.尤其是在这里,由于std::array经常在小型µC上使用,所以最好让实现有一些自由度。

Is this a doc-defect?这是文档缺陷吗?

It's defined to be that way because size_t is defined to be sufficient for all arrays.之所以这样定义,是因为size_t被定义为足以满足所有 arrays 的要求。 If you want a smaller type for smaller arrays, you can always narrow when appropriate based on constexpr values.如果您想要更小的 arrays 的类型,您可以随时根据constexpr值缩小范围。

template <typename Array>
struct small_array_size
{
    using type = size_t
};

template <typename T, size_t N, typename = std::enable_if_t<N < 256>>
struct small_array_size<std::array<T, N>>
{
    using type = uint8_t;
};

template <typename T, size_t N, typename = std::enable_if_t<N < 65536>>
struct small_array_size<std::array<T, N>>
{
    using type = uint16_t;
};

template <typename Array>
using small_array_size_t = typename small_array_size<Array>::type;

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM