简体   繁体   English

SQL:删除自联接中的重复项

[英]SQL: Remove duplicates in self-join

I have the following table (called t1):我有下表(称为 t1):

| id | Name    |
| 1  | Charlie |
| 2  | Bob     |
| 3  | Alice   |

I want to match the table with itself (self-join) but only choose a combination that has not already appeared.我想将表与自身匹配(自联接),但只选择尚未出现的组合。 So far, I have the following:到目前为止,我有以下几点:

select * from t1 a, t1 b
where a.id != b.id

which gives me this result:这给了我这个结果:

| a.id | a.Name  | b.id | b.Name  |
| 2    | Bob     | 1    | Charlie | 
| 3    | Alice   | 1    | Charlie | 
| 1    | Charlie | 2    | Bob     | 
| 3    | Alice   | 2    | Bob     | 
| 1    | Charlie | 3    | Alice   | 
| 2    | Bob     | 3    | Alice   | 

I only want an id to appear once from table a, and once from table b.我只希望一个 id 从表 a 中出现一次,从表 b 中出现一次。 A desired outcome would be:期望的结果是:

| a.id | a.Name  | b.id | b.Name  |
| 2    | Bob     | 1    | Charlie | 
| 3    | Alice   | 2    | Bob     | 
| 1    | Charlie | 3    | Alice   |

But I'm stumped as to how to guarantee this.但我对如何保证这一点感到困惑。

I am using SQL Server 2017.我正在使用 SQL Server 2017。

Here's a fiddle with my test: DEMO这是我的测试的小提琴: DEMO

PS: I've checked this question, but the concept of the solution using a "less than" as a comparison operator isn't clear to me in my own example. PS:我已经检查过这个问题,但是在我自己的例子中,使用“小于”作为比较运算符的解决方案的概念对我来说并不明确。

Edit: There are no rules as to which pair is chosen;编辑:没有关于选择哪一对的规则; the pairs could be (2,3), (3,1), (1,2) instead of the ones I presented above because the only rules I am interested in is having only once each id from table a and from table b , and a.id != b.id .这些对可以是 (2,3), (3,1), (1,2) 而不是我上面介绍的那些,因为我感兴趣的唯一规则是表 a 和表 b 中的每个 id 只有一次,和a.id != b.id

Edit 2: There is no logic to match them, please think about it as this possible premise: I am matchmaking Alice, Bob and Charlie as if they are having a Secret Gift Exchange.编辑2:没有匹配它们的逻辑,请把它想象成这个可能的前提:我正在为爱丽丝、鲍勃和查理做媒,就好像他们在进行秘密礼物交换一样。 They could only offer a gift to one person, could only receive one gift, and could not offer a gift to themselves.他们只能给一个人送礼物,只能收一件礼物,不能给自己送礼物。 (I think this allows scalability) (我认为这允许可扩展性)

Here is one option which uses a ROW_NUMBER trick to stagger each name with a different name:这是一种使用ROW_NUMBER技巧将每个名称与不同名称交错的选项:

WITH cte AS (
    SELECT id, Name, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY id) rn
    FROM t1
)

SELECT
    t1.Name,
    t2.Name
FROM cte t1
INNER JOIN cte t2
    ON (t1.rn % (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM cte)) + 1 = t2.rn;

下面演示的屏幕截图

Demo 演示

The logic is to just match row number 1 with 2, 2 with 3, and 3 with 1 (we use the modulus to wrap around at the edge case).逻辑是将行号 1 与 2、2 与 3、3 与 1 匹配(我们使用模数在边缘情况下环绕)。 This ensures that no name would ever appear more than once in a given column.这确保在给定的列中不会出现任何名称多次。

OP want to match assign each person a random partner, the solution is not completely random and only works if the IDs are continuous. OP 想要匹配为每个人分配一个随机伙伴,该解决方案不是完全随机的,只有在 ID 连续时才有效。 However, it can be fixed by calling combining random/order_by/row_number但是,它可以通过调用组合 random/order_by/row_number 来修复

my lazy fix is:我的懒惰修复是:

select * from t1 a, t1 b
where a.id = b.id % ( select count(*) from t1 c) + 1

Use row_number() .使用row_number() Then do self join based on row number.然后根据行号进行自连接。

select a.id, a.name, b.id, b.name from
    (select row_number() over (order by id desc) rn, id, name from t1) a
join 
    (select row_number() over (order by id asc) rn, id, name from t1) b on a.rn= b.rn

Here is another way to do this.这是执行此操作的另一种方法。

This partitions the data based on which of the two ids are greater and create a concatenated string (larger_id,'|',smaller_id)这将根据两个 id 中的哪个更大来对数据进行分区,并创建一个连接字符串 (larger_id,'|',smaller_id)

After that i am chosing just one value on the concatenated string by checking where rnk=1.之后,我通过检查 rnk=1 的位置在连接的字符串上只选择一个值。

with data
as (
select a.id a_id,a.name as a_name,b.name as b_name,b.id b_id
       ,row_number() over(partition by case when a.id>b.id then concat(a.id,'|',b.id) 
                                            else concat(b.id,'|',a.id) end
                              order by b.id desc)
        as rnk
  from t1 a
  join t1 b
    on a.id != b.id
     )
select *
  from data
 where rnk=1

https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=sqlserver_2017&fiddle=c3f82c8d21dc14899a263adacf1b31e6 https://dbfiddle.uk/?rdbms=sqlserver_2017&fiddle=c3f82c8d21dc14899a263adacf1b31e6

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM