[英]Marsheling error "does not have a no-arg default constructor" when using JAXB with AutoValue
Given the following class:鉴于以下类:
@XmlRootElement(name = "Person")
@AutoValue
@CopyAnnotations
public abstract class Person {
@XmlElement
abstract String name();
public static Builder builder() {
return new AutoValue_Person.Builder();
}
@AutoValue.Builder
public abstract static class Builder {
public abstract Builder name(String name);
public abstract Person build();
}
}
When I run:当我运行时:
Person person = Person.builder().name("Test").build();
StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter();
JAXB.marshal(person, stringWriter);
String xmlContent = stringWriter.toString();
System.out.println(xmlContent);
I always get:我总是得到:
com.example.commands.AutoValue_Person does not have a no-arg default constructor.
this problem is related to the following location:
at com.example.commands.AutoValue_Person
JAXB annotation is placed on a method that is not a JAXB property
this problem is related to the following location:
at @javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement(name=##default, namespace=##default, type=class javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement$DEFAULT, required=false, defaultValue=�, nillable=false)
at com.example.commands.AutoValue_Person
I would like to make it work without the need of creating an adapter as suggested in http://blog.bdoughan.com/2010/12/jaxb-and-immutable-objects.html .我想让它工作而无需按照http://blog.bdoughan.com/2010/12/jaxb-and-immutable-objects.html 中的建议创建适配器。 I have too many data objects and I don't want to duplicate each one of them.我有太多的数据对象,我不想复制它们中的每一个。 Curious enough, there seems to be tons of utilisations for AutoValue with JAXB in GitHub without the use of adapters: https://github.com/search?q=XmlRootElement+autovalue&type=Code奇怪的是,在 GitHub 中似乎有大量使用 JAXB 的 AutoValue 使用而不使用适配器: https : //github.com/search? q=XmlRootElement+autovalue&type=Code
I actually realized the problem after studying your github link, specifically this one: https://github.com/google/nomulus/blob/8f2a8835d7f09ad28806b2345de8d42ebe781fe6/core/src/main/java/google/registry/model/contact/ContactInfoData.java在研究了你的 github 链接后,我实际上意识到了这个问题,特别是这个: https : //github.com/google/nomulus/blob/8f2a8835d7f09ad28806b2345de8d42ebe781fe6/core/src/main/java/google/registry/model/contact/ContactInfoData.java
Notice the naming structure used in the sample AutoValue Java class, it still uses the getVal
and setVal
注意示例 AutoValue Java 类中使用的命名结构,它仍然使用getVal
和setVal
Here is a simple example based on my code that now works:这是一个基于我现在可以工作的代码的简单示例:
import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlAttribute;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement;
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlType;
@XmlRootElement(name = "Customer")
@XmlType(propOrder = {"name", "age", "id"})
@AutoValue.CopyAnnotations
@AutoValue
public abstract class Customer {
public static Builder builder() {
return new AutoValue_Customer.Builder();
}
@XmlElement(name = "name")
abstract String getName();
@XmlElement(name = "age")
abstract int getAge();
@XmlAttribute(name = "id")
abstract int getId();
@AutoValue.Builder
public abstract static class Builder {
public abstract Builder setName(String name);
public abstract Builder setAge(int age);
public abstract Builder setId(int id);
public abstract Customer build();
}
}
Notice I use setName(String name)
in the builder but String getName()
in the class itself.请注意,我在构建器中使用setName(String name)
而在类本身中使用String getName()
。 Try to refactor your code to those conventions.尝试将您的代码重构为这些约定。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.