将通用服务与其实现和子类型绑定

Question

Disclaimer: Bear with me for a good amount of code to explain the scenario.

In one of the maven modules (core), we have the following classes:

abstract class ReportingEvent {
}

abstract class Element {

    public <E extends ReportingEvent> Optional<E> getReportEvent() {
        return Optional.empty();
    }

}

services such as:

public interface Reporting<E extends ReportingEvent> {
    void report(E event);
}

interface InternalService {
}

public class InternalServiceImpl implements InternalService {

    @Inject
    Reporting<ReportingEvent> reporting; // 1. Possible to use a generic type? How?

    private void reportEvents(BatchRequest batchRequest) {
        batchRequest.stream()
                // section below is of importance
                .map(m -> m.getEntity().getReportEvent()) // the generic method from 'Element'
                .filter(Optional::isPresent)
                .map(Optional::get)
                .forEach(event -> reporting.report(event)); // method from 'Reporting'
    }
}

class CoreBindingModule extends AbstractModule {
    protected void configure() {
        bind(InternalService.class).to(InternalServiceImpl.class).in(Singleton.class);
    }
}

---

Further in another maven module(consumer) that we deploy, we have classes related to and implementing the above as:

abstract class BaseReporting extends ReportingEvent {
}

class ColdReporting extends BaseReporting {
}

abstract class Node extends Element {
}

class Cold extends Node {
    @Override
    public Optional<ColdReporting> getReportEvent() {
        return Optional.ofNullable(new ColdReporting()); // some business logic
    }
}

class ReportingImpl implements Reporting<ReportingEvent> { // 2. Use 'BaseReporting' here
    void report(ReportingEvent event){}
}

class ConsumerBindingModule extends AbstractModule {
    protected void configure() {
        bind(new TypeLiteral<Reporting<ReportingEvent>>() {}).to(ReportingImpl.class).in(Singleton.class);
    }
}

---

The above code works fine. But the problem is the use of types that don't quite relate to the modules.

^A... So if I change the binding in the consumer module to

bind(new TypeLiteral<Reporting<BaseReporting>>() {}).to(ReportingImpl.class).in(Singleton.class);

with

class ReportingImpl implements Reporting<BaseReporting> {
    void report(BaseReporting event){}
}

I get an error

No implementation for Reporting<ReportEvent> was bound. while locating Reporting<ReportEvent> for field at InternalServiceImpl.reporting(InternalServiceImpl.java:21)

which is relevant and I cannot make use of Reporting<BaseReporting> in the core module anyway.

^B... On the other hand if I try to inject Reporting as:

@Inject
Reporting<? extends ReportingEvent> reporting;

then IDEA states

 Required type: capture of ? Provided: ReportingEvent

on the line

...forEach(event -> reporting.report(event))

Is there a way to get around this situation while trying to solve for ¹ and ² as mentioned in the code sections?

Answer 1

(I might be restating what you already know for the most part)

Keeping aside your Guice related modules and configuration, your problem can be written down as

Reporting<ReportingEvent> reportingEvent = new ReportingImpl();
Reporting<? extends ReportingEvent> reporting = baseReporting;
reporting.report(reportingEvent); //won't work

which is identical to

List<? extends String> list = new ArrayList<>();
list.add("a"); //won't work

---

Say, you have a HotReporting class that extends BaseReporting , thus you have something like this

public class ReportingImpl implements Reporting<ReportingEvent> { 
    public void report(ReportingEvent event){}
}
public class ColdReportingImpl implements Reporting<ColdReporting> { 
    public void report(ColdReporting event){}
}

public class HotReportingImpl implements Reporting<HotReporting> { 
    public void report(HotReporting event){}
}

Assume if you injected a HotReportingImpl for the field Reporting<? extends ReportingEvent> reporting Reporting<? extends ReportingEvent> reporting .

In your code what if m.getEntity().getReportEvent() returns a ColdReporting ? It is not compatible with what the report method expects here (a HotReporting ).

---

Option 1:

I would try to get rid of the generic type parameters and define Reporting as

public interface Reporting {
    void report(ReportingEvent event);
}

public class BaseReportingImpl implements Reporting {
    @Override
    public void report(ReportingEvent event) {

    }
}
//... and so on

Problems:

• If you relied on the exact subtype of a ReportingEvent in the implementation (need typecasts which is not good).
• Still, a HotReportingImpl can get a ColdReporting object as an argument.

Option 2:

You can make the InternalService generic by adding the type parameters to it.

---

If the classes implementing Reporting have to deal with concrete types of ReportingEvent , then it doesn't seem right for Element to return the base type ( ReportingEvent ).

Have a look at Typesafe heterogeneous containers by Joshua Bloch . Your problem overlaps with that. You can maintain a mapping from the type of ReportingEvent to the corresponding subclass of Reporting with that type argument.