打字稿共享函数重载

Question

Let's say I have a function with multiple overloads. Is there any way to "share" the same overloads in a different function?

function getEmployee(id: number): Employee;
function getEmployee(email: string): Employee;
function getEmployee(email: number, name: string): Employee;
function getEmployee (paramOne: string | number, paramTwo?: string ): Employee { 
  return employee;
}

If I want to use the same overloads in other functions, I need to copy all of them manually.

Answer 1

If you want to share types you can do something like this:

interface GetEmployeeFunctionType {
    (id: number): Employee;
    (email: string): Employee;
    (email: number, name: string): Employee;
    (paramOne: string | number, paramTwo?: string): Employee;
}

And then your new function just type it like so:

const newFunction: GetEmployeeFunctionType = (/** your parameters */) => {// implementation}

When you call newFunction it will give you correct intelisense.

Answer 2

As per @Kaca992 answer, I believe it should be altered in a way, since the last signature is not an overload signature but an implementation signature.

interface GetEmployeeFunctionType {
    (id: number): Employee;
    (email: string): Employee;
    (email: number, name: string): Employee;
}

const newFunction: GetEmployeeFunctionType = (paramOne: string | number, paramTwo?: string): Employee => {/* implementation */}

On the other hand, you can always create a higher order function to wrap the signatures:

interface GetEmployeeFunctionType {
    (id: number): Employee;
    (email: string): Employee;
    (email: number, name: string): Employee;
}

function wrap(func: (paramOne: string | number, paramTwo?: string) => Employee): GetEmployeeFunctionType {
    return func;
}

// usage:
const f = wrap((arg1, arg2) => {/* implementation */});

See TypeScript Playgound for that

Answer 3

As of May 2020, syntax for this case is not currently available . There are relevant issues in the TypeScript issue tracker:

• #22063: "Suggestion: Type annotations and interfaces for function declarations" (Feb 2018)
• #34319: "Describe function signature using an interface" (Oct 2019)
• #37433: "Add mechanism for specifying the type of a function declaration" (Mar 2020, closed as dupe of #22063)

Though there are workarounds using interfaces and call signatures as in Kaca992's answer , they do not result in the same method structure as the syntax you requested (and that is proposed in those issues).