限制从 AWS SQS 触发的 AWS Lambda 的并发调用（忽略预留并发）？

Question

To me this seemed like a simple use case when I started, but it turned out a lot harder than I had anticipated.

Problem

I have an AWS SQS acting as a job queue that triggers a worker AWS Lambda. However since the worker lambdas are sharing non-scalable resources it is important to limit the number of concurrent running lambdas to (for the sake of example) no more than 5 lambdas running simultaneously.

Simple enough, according to Managing Concurrency for a Lambda Function

Reserved concurrency also limits the maximum concurrency for the function, and applies to the function as a whole

However, setting the Reserved concurrency -property to 5 seems to be completely ignored by SQS, with the queue Messages in Flight -property in my case showing closer to 20-30 concurrent executions depending on the amount of messages put into the queue.

Question

The closest I have come to a solution is to use a SQS FIFO queue and setting the MessageGroupId to a value of either randomly selecting or alternating between 1-5. However, due to uneven workload this is not optimal as it would be better to have the concurrency distributed by actual workload rather than by chance.

I have also tried using the AWS Step Functions as the Map-state has a MaxConcurrency parameter, which seemed to work well on small job queues, but due to each state having an input/output limit of 32kb, this was not feasible in my use-case.

Has anyone found a better or alternative solution? Are there any other ways Reserved concurrency is supposed to be used?

Similar

Here are some similar questions I have found, but I think my question is different because I am not interested in limiting the total number of invocation , and (although I have not tried it myself) I can not see why triggers from S3 or Kinesis Steam would behave different from SQS.

Answer 1

According to AWS docs AWS SQS doesn't take into account reserved concurrency. If number of batches to be processed is greater than reserved concurrency, your messages might end up in a dead-letter queue:

If your function returns an error, or can't be invoked because it's at maximum concurrency, processing might succeed with additional attempts. To give messages a better chance to be processed before sending them to the dead-letter queue, set the maxReceiveCount on the source queue's redrive policy to at least 5. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/with-sqs.html

You can check this article for details: https://zaccharles.medium.com/lambda-concurrency-limits-and-sqs-triggers-dont-mix-well-sometimes-eb23d90122e0

Answer 2

This issue is resolved today Jan 2023. You can use maximum concurrency as suggested in this blog. I was using FIFO with groupid as my backend was non-scalable and i wanted to not have any throttling issue as having too many messages on DLQ does not help.

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/introducing-maximum-concurrency-of-aws-lambda-functions-when-using-amazon-sqs-as-an-event-source/