[英]Is it considered bad practice to use a raw pointer in a constructor with the intention of wrapping it immediately in a smart pointer?
I want users not to have to create smart pointers to pass into object contructors themselves, but instead to pass in a raw pointer and then convert to a smart pointer within the initialisation.我希望用户不必自己创建智能指针来传递给 object 构造函数,而是传入原始指针,然后在初始化中转换为智能指针。 However, there are some warning bells ringing regarding creating memory leaks so I wanted to check: Is the following code problematic in any way?但是,有一些关于创建 memory 泄漏的警钟响起,所以我想检查一下:以下代码有任何问题吗?
#include <memory>
using namespace std;
class A {
private:
std::unique_ptr<int> num;
public:
explicit A(int* n){
num = std::make_unique<int>(*n);
}
};
int main(){
int n = 4;
A a(&n);
// A a(std::make_unique<A>(n)); // instead of having to do this, which is a moderately irritating
};
If you want to avoid smart pointer in interface, you might use by value or const reference:如果要避免接口中的智能指针,可以按值或常量引用使用:
class A {
private:
std::unique_ptr<int> num;
public:
explicit A(int n) : num(std::make_unique<int>(n)) {}
};
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.