如何替换 AWS Auto Scaling 组中的特定实例？

Question

I'm looking for a procedure that I can use to replace a specific instance in an AWS scalegroup, all the while maintaining AZ "balance" and not reducing capacity while waiting for a new instance to provision.

Occasionally, we may have reason to terminate a specific EC2 instance in a scale group, and have struggled to have an efficient procedure for doing this. I know that I can terminate the instance directly and it will be replaced, but that reduces the overall capacity of the scalegroup temporarily while waiting for a new instance to provision. In our case this is tens of minutes as we must setup and deploy our software before the ALB can send requests

If we increase the desired_capacity by 1, we can prepare a new instance in advance - but there is no guarantee that it will be created in the same AZ as the instance we wish to terminate. In addition, if I terminate the offending instance, and immediately reduce the desired_capacity will the scalegroup terminate another instance?

So what is the best way to manage this procedure?

Answer 1

You can temporarily suspend and resume specific scaling processes . With this feature you can achieve the desired result in multiple ways, two of which I've described below:

A: Use the Auto Scaling Group's rebalance feature

1. Increase the Auto Scaling Group's desired instance count by 1 and wait for the new instance to be available
2. Temporarily suspend the Launch scaling process (this prevents an automatic launch of a new instance during the next step)
3. Terminate the faulty instance
4. Decrease the Auto Scaling Group's desired instance count by 1 (the number of desired instances and the actual number of instances should now be in sync again)
5. Resume the Launch scaling process. If the remaining instances are unbalanced the Auto Scaling Group's AZRebalance process will pick this up and gradually rebalance across the AZs.

B: Explicitly start a new instance in the desired AZ:

1. Start a separate instance in the desired AZ
2. Temporarily suspend the Terminate scaling process] (this prevents an automatic termination of the additional instance during the next step)
3. Attach the instance from (1.) to the Auto Scaling Group
4. Terminate the original instance (the number of desired instances and the actual number of instances should now be in sync again)
5. Resume the Terminate scaling process

Answer 2

Auto Scaling provides the ability to:

• Attach a specific instance to the Auto Scaling group (which was created outside of Auto Scaling)
• Detach a specific instance from the Auto Scaling group
• Terminate a specific instance in an Auto Scaling group
• Temporarily place an instance in an Auto Scaling group into a standby state

When detaching, terminating or placing in standby, the Desired Capacity of the Auto Scaling group can be automatically decremented so no replacement instance is launched, or it can be kept the same so that a replacement instance is launched.

It would generally be a good idea to have Auto Scaling launch any new instances, so that all instances are identical. Thus, if you are concerned about a capacity drop, then you should increment the Desired Capacity to launch a new instance, then terminate the unwanted instance from the Auto Scaling group with a capacity decrease to return the group to the previous Desired Capacity.

You are correct that the instance launched will not be guaranteed to be in the same AZ as the one being removed. Auto Scaling aims to balance AZs . It will launch an instance in an AZ that has the lowest number of instances. Let's say there are two AZs that have an equal number of instances and you wish to remove an instance from AZ A. Incrementing the Desired Capacity might launch an instance in AZ B. Once the unwanted instance has been removed, this would mean that AZ B has two instances more than AZ A. Whether this is a problem depends upon the total number of instances in the Auto Scaling group.

The recommendation to use multiple AZs is to handle situations where an AZ might fail. Such a failure would result in a temporary loss of instances while Auto Scaling launches new instances in the remaining AZs. If such a drop is a concern, it is recommended to run extra instances to handle the temporary capacity drop. Thus, returning to your Question, your Auto Scaling group should have sufficient capacity to handle one instance being removed and replaced . If a temporary drop in capacity is going to impact your system, then it would be a good idea to have extra instances launched, on the assumption that instances can/will fail occasionally. This will also help the rare situation in which an AZ fails, since having extra capacity would mean that the system does not immediately lose 50% of required minimum capacity.

Bottom line: Have sufficient capacity so that temporarily replacing a bad instance should not have a significant impact on the system. The concern about having an unbalanced AZ will be minor (max 2 instances different between AZs) compared to the impact of losing 50% of capacity in an AZ outage if only minimal capacity is being continually deployed.

At the end of the day, it really comes down to cost vs risk. Using more than 2 AZs can reduce the impact of AZ outages.