简体   繁体   English

Oracle-插入查询慢

[英]Oracle- Insert query slow

I'm doing an insert as:我正在插入:

insert /*+ NOLOGGING */ into myTable
  select /*+ parallel(3) */ * from myTmpTable;

Here the explain plan:这里解释计划:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                | Name                       | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | INSERT STATEMENT         |                            |  110M |  5776M|    91428(2)| 00:03:30 |        |      |            |
|   1 |  LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL | myTable                    |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   2 |   PX COORDINATOR         |                            |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
|   3 |    PX SEND QC (RANDOM)   | :TQ10000                   |  110M |  5776M|    91428(2)| 00:03:30 |  Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
|   4 |     PX BLOCK ITERATOR    |                            |  110M |  5776M|    91428(2)| 00:03:30 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
|   5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL   | myTmpTable                 |  110M |  5776M|    91428(2)| 00:03:30 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

myTmpTable have a total of 110M of rows and the pk of myTable was already setted in the temporary tale. myTmpTable 总共有 110M 的行,并且 myTable 的 pk 已经设置在临时故事中。

When I run the query I've seen during the FULL ACCES when reached the 60M the performance decrease significantly, it load 1k/500 row at time when at the beginning load 5M.当我运行在 FULL ACCES 期间看到的查询时,当达到 60M 时性能显着下降,它在开始加载 5M 时加载 1k/500 行。

Optimizer优化器


NAME                                 TYPE    VALUE    
------------------------------------ ------- -------- 
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean FALSE    
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer 2        
optimizer_features_enable            string  11.2.0.4 
optimizer_index_caching              integer 0        
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer 100      
optimizer_mode                       string  ALL_ROWS 
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean TRUE     
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes      boolean FALSE    
optimizer_use_pending_statistics     boolean FALSE    
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines     boolean TRUE 

EDIT编辑

Here the statistics after an execution of a portion of 2M (more or less):这里是执行部分 2M(或多或少)后的统计数据:

                        Total     For Execution   For Row
Executions                  1                 1     <0.01
Time Elapsed(sec)   22.862,82         22.862,82      0,01
Time CPU(sec)          673,69            673,69     <0.01
Buffer Requests    26.019.084        26.019.084     12,70
Disk Reads          3.073.558         3.073.558      1.50
Direct                      0                 0      0,00
Rows               2.0048.853        2.0048.853         1
FETCH                       0                 0         0

I think the NOLOGGING is wrong.我认为NOLOGGING是错误的。 It should go to an alter table statement:它应该 go 到一个 alter table 语句:

ALTER TABLE mytable NOLOGGING;

ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL DML;

Instead of the nologging, the hint should be APPEND :而不是 nologging,提示应该是APPEND

insert /*+ APPEND */ into myTable
  select * from myTmpTable;

Your INSERT statement is very very very slow because I have tested a similar request on my home PC with Oracle 11.2.0.4 in a Linux VM.您的 INSERT 语句非常非常非常慢,因为我在 Linux VM 中使用 Oracle 11.2.0.4 在我的家用 PC 上测试了类似的请求。

I have a 9 GB table (134M rows) that I can copy without parallelism in 11 minutes:我有一个 9 GB 的表(134M 行),我可以在 11 分钟内复制它而无需并行:

OPS$ORACLE@FTEX>explain plan for insert into nt select * from t;

Explained.

OPS$ORACLE@FTEX>select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1601196873

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation        | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | INSERT STATEMENT     |  |   134M|  9472M|   402K  (1)| 01:20:28 |
|   1 |  LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL | NT   |   |   |        |      |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL  | T    |   134M|  9472M|   402K  (1)| 01:20:28 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9 rows selected.

OPS$ORACLE@FTEX>set timing on
OPS$ORACLE@FTEX>insert into nt select * from t;

134217728 rows created.

Elapsed: 00:11:16.40             
OPS$ORACLE@FTEX>commit;

But without the real execution plan it is impossible to know where the time is spent (CPU? IO? something else???): we can only try to guess and "shoot in the dark".但是如果没有真正的执行计划,就不可能知道时间花在了哪里(CPU?IO?别的什么???):我们只能尝试猜测并“在黑暗中射击”。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM