如何在 Python 3.7 中重新实现 Python 的 __qualname__？ （有一些小的调整）

Question

The __qualname__ attribute is useful to me because it contextualizes functions; however, it's difficult for me to use for my use case because:

1. __qualname__ returns a string. For my usecase, I need references to the parent object(s).

2. __qualname__ sometimes returns the super class instead of the referenced class. For example:

    class Parent(): def __init__(self): pass class Child(Parent): pass print(Child.__init__.__qualname__) # Prints: "Parent.__init__"

3. The package I am developing needs to be robust, and the edge cases for __qualname__ are not documented as far as I can tell.

Outside of parsing the Python file with ast , can __qualname__ be reimplemented in Python3 with inspection? How does Python implement __qualname__ ? In reimplementing the core functionality, I think I'll be able to adapt it for my use case.

---

Prior Research:

• PEP 3155: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3155/
• Python 2 qualname implementation: https://github.com/wbolster/qualname/blob/master/qualname.py
• Parsing __qualname__ to get references: Get defining class of unbound method object in Python 3
• Python 2 __qualname__ stackoverflow: Reproduce effects of Python 3.3 __qualname__ in earlier Pythons

I was unable to find the qualname implementation in the Python source code.

Answer 1

You're not going to get what you want. You want your_thing(Parent.__init__) to say something about Parent and your_thing(Child.__init__) to say something about Child , but Parent.__init__ and Child.__init__ are the same exact object.

You've accessed that object two different ways, but Python keeps no record of that. Whatever you implement will only receive a function object, without the information you're looking for.

Even if you do some horrible stack inspection thing to look at the fact that the source code for your_thing(Child.__init__) says "Child" in it, that won't work for cases where the function gets stored in a variable or passed around through a few more layers of function calls. It'll only work, unreliably, for a fraction of cases where you don't need it because you already had the information you wanted when you were writing the code.