std::move() 和 std::add_rvalue_reference() 之间的区别
[英]Difference between std::move() and std::add_rvalue_reference()
问题描述
Can somebody explain the difference between std::move() and std::add_rvalue_reference() ?
有人可以解释std::move()和std::add_rvalue_reference()之间的区别吗？ Do both serve the same purpose?两者的目的相同吗？ If yes, what is the advantage of one over the other?如果是的话，一个比另一个有什么优势？
1 个解决方案
解决方案1
7 已采纳 2020-12-28 17:01:48
std::move is a cast on an object, std::add_rvalue_reference manipulates a type, other than both dealing with r-value references they aren't really related. std::move是对 object 的强制转换， std::add_rvalue_reference操纵一个类型，除了处理它们并不真正相关的 r 值引用。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.
相关问题
std :: add_lvalue_reference和std :: add_rvalue_reference的目的是什么？ - What is the purpose of std::add_lvalue_reference and std::add_rvalue_reference?
静态转换到右值引用和 std::move 之间有什么区别吗 - is there any difference between static cast to rvalue reference and std::move
关于 add_rvalue_reference 实施的问题 - question about implementation of add_rvalue_reference
std::move 不为右值引用移动 - std::move does not move for rvalue reference
std :: move无法在RValue参考函数上使用 - std::move Not Working on RValue Reference Function
通过右值引用传递并使用std :: move（）返回？ - Pass by rvalue reference and return using std::move()?
std::forward 和有什么区别<T> () 和 std::move 完美转发右值引用时？ - What is the difference between std::forward<T>() and std::move when perfectly forwarding rvalue references?
在右值引用参数上使用 std::move 的原因 - Reason to use std::move on rvalue reference parameter
包装右值引用Lambda时std :: async和std :: bind之间的区别 - Difference between std::async and std::bind when wrapping rvalue reference lambda
将左值绑定到右值引用时，std :: forward vs std :: move - std::forward vs std::move while binding lvalue to rvalue reference
相关标签