[英]How to access an element from a list of lists in python networkX? TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable
I have an output from my loop, where G is a Graph from networkX.我的循环中有一个 output,其中 G 是来自 networkX 的图。
for node in G.nodes():
start_end = [(node,k) for k,v in nx.shortest_path_length(G, node).items() if v == d]
print (start_end)
which is lots of list classes with tuples inside them.这是很多列表类,里面有元组。 (if it was just one list, it would be easy to do start_end[0][0].) (如果只是一个列表,很容易做 start_end[0][0]。)
<class 'list'>
<class 'list'>
<class 'list'>
<class 'list'>
....
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[('45', '27'), ('45', '26'), ('45', '39'), ('45', '24'), ('45', '81'), ('45', '29'), ('45', '46'), ('45', '51'), ('45', '23'), ('45', '8'), ('45', '60'), ('45', '83'), ('45', '86'), ('45', '149'), ('45', '18'), ('45', '99'), ('45', '78'), ('45', '120'), ('45', '134'), ('45', '121'), ('45', '122')]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[('129', '134')]
[]
[('134', '92'), ('134', '97')]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
I want to grab the first element of the longest list '45', in this example.在本例中,我想获取最长列表“45”的第一个元素。 I have tried to sort the lists by length.我试图按长度对列表进行排序。
sorted(start_end, reverse=True)
max(start_end)
which yields an error这会产生错误
#TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable
I have also tried我也试过
start_end = len([(node,k) for k,v in nx.shortest_path_length(G_sc, node).items() if v == d])
print(max(current))
with the same error.有同样的错误。
Below is the pseudo-code that you can reproduce.以下是您可以重现的伪代码。 here, how can I access the tuple ((2, 1) from the second (longest) list?在这里,我如何从第二个(最长的)列表中访问元组 ((2, 1) ?
In:
import networkx as nx
G = nx.DiGraph()
G.add_edge(1,2); G.add_edge(1,4)
G.add_edge(3,1); G.add_edge(3,4)
G.add_edge(2,3); G.add_edge(4,3)
for node in G.nodes():
start_end_nodes = [(node, k) for k,v in nx.shortest_path_length(G,
node).items() if v == 2]
print(start_end_nodes)
Out:
[(1, 3)]
[(2, 1), (2, 4)]
[(4, 1)]
[(3, 2)]
One way to solve this issue is to store all the start_end
values in a list - start_ends
- and then getting the max based on len
:解决此问题的一种方法是将所有start_end
值存储在列表中 - start_ends
- 然后根据len
获取最大值:
max(start_ends, key=len)
def f2(G):
start_ends = []
d = 2
for node in G.nodes():
start_end = [(node, k) for k,v in nx.shortest_path_length(G, node).items() if v == d]
start_ends.append(start_end)
#print(max(start_ends, key=len)[0])
return max(start_ends, key=len)[0]
#In:
G = nx.DiGraph()
G.add_edge(1,2); G.add_edge(1,4)
G.add_edge(3,1); G.add_edge(3,4)
G.add_edge(2,3); G.add_edge(4,3)
f2(G)
#Out:
(2, 1)
You could also use sorted
for the same effect but I'd recommend using it if you want the list sorted and not just the max.您也可以使用sorted
来获得相同的效果,但如果您希望列表排序而不仅仅是最大值,我建议您使用它。
# to sort use:
start_ends_sorted = sorted(start_ends, key=len, reverse=True)
# to get the same result as before:
start_ends_max = start_ends_sorted[0][0]
# ---------------
# In your example:
start_ends_sorted = [[(2, 1), (2, 4)],
[(1, 3)],
[(4, 1)],
[(3, 2)]]
start_ends_max = (2, 1)
somebody suggested this version to me by creating an empty dictionary.有人通过创建一个空字典向我推荐了这个版本。 so I'm trying to understand how this works, more specifically, the line 'scores[node] = end_node, and if its better(faster) than yours.所以我试图了解它是如何工作的,更具体地说,'scores[node] = end_node 行,以及它是否比你的更好(更快)。
def f2(G):
scores = {}
d = 2
for node in G.nodes():
shortest = nx.shortest_path_length(G_sc, node)
end_node = len([k for k,v in shortest.items() if v == d])
scores[node] = end_node
return ((max(scores))
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.