[英]Number of arguments of composition in haskell
Recently I have been learning about compositions in haskell and am now a bit confused concerning this example.最近我一直在学习 haskell 中的组合,现在对这个例子有点困惑。
(const . min) 3 0 4
As a result I get 3, so internally it must be computed like:结果我得到 3,所以在内部它必须像这样计算:
const (min 3) 0 4
But I thought since min takes two arguments, it should look like this:但我想既然 min 需要两个 arguments,它应该是这样的:
const (min 3 0) 4
So apparently the composition only takes this one argument, in this case 3, instead of all the arguments for min like I expected it to.因此,显然该组合只采用了这一论点,在这种情况下为 3,而不是像我预期的那样,所有的 arguments 都是最小的。 Does that mean compositions only take one argument per default or what am I not getting here?
这是否意味着作品在默认情况下只接受一个参数,或者我在这里没有得到什么?
You can answer your question by manually evaluating the initial expression.您可以通过手动评估初始表达式来回答您的问题。
(const . min) 3 0 4
⇒ (\x -> const (min x)) 3 0 4 * defn of (.)
⇒ (const (min 3)) 0 4 * function application
⇒ ((\x y -> x) (min 3)) 0 4 * defn of const
⇒ (\y -> min 3) 0 4 * function application
⇒ (min 3) 4 * function application
⇒ 3 * because 3 is less than 4
It is worth noting that function application is left-associative, so, fxy
means the same as (fx) y
.值得注意的是 function 应用程序是左关联的,因此
fxy
与(fx) y
的含义相同。
It is also worth noting that \xy -> z
means the same as \x -> \y -> z
.还值得注意的是
\xy -> z
与\x -> \y -> z
z 的含义相同。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.