Java FileInputStream FileOutputStream 在运行中的区别

Question

Could someone tell me why the 1. run is wrong? (The return code is 0, but the file written is only half of the original one.

Thanks in advance!

public class FileCopyFisFos {

    public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {

        FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream("d:/Test1/OrigFile.MP4");
        FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream("d:/Test2/DestFile.mp4");

// 1. run
//        while (fis.read() != -1){
//            int len = fis.read();
//            fos.write(len);
//        }

// 2. run
//        int len;
//        while ((len = fis.read()) != -1){
//            fos.write(len);
//        }

        fis.close();
        fos.close();
    }
}

Answer 1

FileInputStream 's read() method follows this logic:

Reads a byte of data from this input stream. This method blocks if no input is yet available.

So assigning the value of its return to a variable, such as:

while((len = fis.read())!= -1) 

Is avoiding the byte of data just read from the stream to be forgotten, as every read() call will be assigned to your len variable.

---

Instead, this code bypasses one of every two bytes from the stream, as the read() executed in the while condition is never assigned to a variable. So the stream advances without half of the bytes being read (assigned to len ):

while (fis.read() != -1) {      // reads a byte of data (but not saved)
   int len = fis.read();        // next byte of data saved
   fos.write(len);              // possible -1 written here    
}

Answer 2

@aran and others already pointed out the solution to your problem.

However there are more sides to this, so I extended your example:

import java.io.BufferedInputStream;
import java.io.BufferedOutputStream;
import java.io.File;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.FileOutputStream;
import java.io.IOException;

public class FileCopyFisFos {

    public static void main(final String[] args) throws IOException {
        final File src = new File("d:/Test1/OrigFile.MP4");
        final File sink = new File("d:/Test2/DestFile.mp4");

        {
            final long startMS = System.currentTimeMillis();
            final long bytesCopied = copyFileSimple(src, sink);
            System.out.println("Simple copy transferred " + bytesCopied + " bytes in " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startMS) + "ms");
        }
        {
            final long startMS = System.currentTimeMillis();
            final long bytesCopied = copyFileSimpleFaster(src, sink);
            System.out.println("Simple+Fast copy transferred " + bytesCopied + " bytes in " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startMS) + "ms");
        }
        {
            final long startMS = System.currentTimeMillis();
            final long bytesCopied = copyFileFast(src, sink);
            System.out.println("Fast copy transferred " + bytesCopied + " bytes in " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startMS) + "ms");
        }

        System.out.println("Test completed.");
    }

    static public long copyFileSimple(final File pSourceFile, final File pSinkFile) throws IOException {
        try (
                final FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(pSourceFile);
                final FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(pSinkFile);) {

            long totalBytesTransferred = 0;
            while (true) {
                final int readByte = fis.read();
                if (readByte < 0) break;

                fos.write(readByte);
                ++totalBytesTransferred;
            }
            return totalBytesTransferred;
        }
    }

    static public long copyFileSimpleFaster(final File pSourceFile, final File pSinkFile) throws IOException {
        try (
                final FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(pSourceFile);
                final FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(pSinkFile);
                BufferedInputStream bis = new BufferedInputStream(fis);
                BufferedOutputStream bos = new BufferedOutputStream(fos);) {

            long totalBytesTransferred = 0;
            while (true) {
                final int readByte = bis.read();
                if (readByte < 0) break;

                bos.write(readByte);
                ++totalBytesTransferred;
            }
            return totalBytesTransferred;
        }
    }

    static public long copyFileFast(final File pSourceFile, final File pSinkFile) throws IOException {
        try (
                final FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(pSourceFile);
                final FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(pSinkFile);) {

            long totalBytesTransferred = 0;
            final byte[] buffer = new byte[20 * 1024];
            while (true) {
                final int bytesRead = fis.read(buffer);
                if (bytesRead < 0) break;

                fos.write(buffer, 0, bytesRead);
                totalBytesTransferred += bytesRead;
            }
            return totalBytesTransferred;
        }
    }

}

The hints that come along with that code:

• There is the java.nio package that usualy does those things a lot faster and in less code.
• Copying single bytes is 1'000-40'000 times slower that bulk copy.
• Using try/resource/catch is the best way to avoid problems with reserved/locked resources like files etc.
• If you solve something that is quite commonplace, I suggest you put it in a utility class of your own or even your own library.
• There are helper classes like BufferedInputStream and BufferedOutputStream that take care of efficiency greatly; see example copyFileSimpleFaster().
• But as usual, it is the quality of the concept that has the most impact on the implementation; see example copyFileFast().
• There are even more advanced concepts (similar to java.nio), that take into account concepts like OS caching behaviour etc, which will give performance another kick.

Check my outputs, or run it on your own, to see the differences in performance:

Simple copy transferred 1608799 bytes in 12709ms
Simple+Fast copy transferred 1608799 bytes in 51ms
Fast copy transferred 1608799 bytes in 4ms
Test completed.