Memory C# 中的 byte[] 分片

Question

The C#/.NET application I am working on makes use of huge byte arrays and is having memory fragmentation issues. Checked memory usage using CLRMemory

The Code we use is as follows

PdfLoadedDocument loadedDocument = new PdfLoadedDocument("myLoadedDocument.pdf");

// Operations on pdf document

using (var stream = new MemoryStream())
{
    loadedDocument.Save(stream);
    loadedDocument.Close(true);
    return stream.ToArray(); //byte[]
}

And we use similar code at multiple places across our application and we call this in loop for generating bulk audits ranging from a few 100's to 10000's

1. Now is there a better way to handle this to avoild fragmentation

And as part of audits, we also download large files from Amazon S3 using the following code

using (var client = new AmazonS3Client(_accessKey, _secretKey, _region))
{
   var getObjectRequest = new GetObjectRequest();
   getObjectRequest.BucketName = "bucketName";
   getObjectRequest.Key = "keyName";

   using (var downloadStream = new MemoryStream())
   {
       using (var response = await client.GetObjectAsync(getObjectRequest))
       {
           using (var responseStream = response.ResponseStream)
           {
               await responseStream.CopyToAsync(downloadStream);
           }
           return downloadStream.ToArray(); //byte[]
       }
   }
}

2. Is there a better alternative to download large files without them moving to LOH which is taking a toll with Garbage Collector

Answer 1

There's two different things here:

1. the internals of MemoryStream
2. the usage of .ToArray()

For what happens inside MemoryStream : it is implemented as a simple byte[] , but you can mitigate a lot of the overhead of that by using RecyclableMemoryStream instead via the Microsoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream nuget package, which re-uses buffers between independent usages.

For ToArray() , frankly: don't do that . When using vanilla MemoryStream , the better approach is TryGetBuffer(...) , which gives you the oversized backing buffer, along with the start/end tokens:

if (!memStream.TryGetBuffer(out var segment))
    throw new InvalidOperationException("Unable to obtain data segment; oops?");
// see segment.Offset, .Count, and .Array

It is then your job to not look outside those bounds . If you want to make that easier: consider treating the segment as a span (or memory) instead:

ReadOnlySpan<byte> muchSafer = segment;
// now you can't read out of bounds, and you don't need to apply the offset yourself

This TryGetBuffer(...) approach, however, does not work well with RecyclableMemoryStream - as it makes a defensive copy to prevent problems with independent data; in that scenario, you should treat the stream simply as a stream , ie Stream - just write to it, rewind it ( Position = 0 ), and have the consumer read from it, then dispose it when they are done.

---

As a side note: when reading (or writing) using the Stream API: consider using the array-pool for your scratch buffers; so instead of:

var buffer = new byte[1024];
int bytesRead;
while ((bytesRead = stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
{...}

instead try:

var buffer = ArrayPool<byte>.Shared.Rent(1024);
try
{
    int bytesRead;
    while ((bytesRead = stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) > 0)
    {...}
}
finally
{
    ArrayPool<byte>.Shared.Return(buffer);
}

---

In more advanced scenarios, it may be wise to use the pipelines API rather than the stream API; the point here is that pipelines allows discontiguous buffers, so you never need ridiculously large buffers even when dealing with complex scenarios. This is a niche API, however, and has very limited support in public APIs.