[英]infinite type error reversing a list in Haskell
I'm trying to implement the reverse of a list:我正在尝试实现列表的反向:
myLast :: [a] -> a
myLast [] = error "No end for empty lists!"
myLast [x] = x
myLast (_:xs) = myLast xs
myReverse :: [a] -> [a]
myReverse (x:xs) = myLast xs + myReverse xs
but I get this error:但我收到此错误:
/workspaces/hask_exercises/exercises/src/Lib.hs:42:32: error:
* Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a ~ [a]
* In the second argument of `(+)', namely `myReverse xs'
In the expression: myLast xs + myReverse xs
In an equation for `myReverse':
myReverse (x : xs) = myLast xs + myReverse xs
* Relevant bindings include
xs :: [a] (bound at src/Lib.hs:42:14)
x :: a (bound at src/Lib.hs:42:12)
myReverse :: [a] -> [a] (bound at src/Lib.hs:41:1)
|
42 | myReverse (x:xs) = myLast xs + myReverse xs
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
What does it mean that cannot construct the infinite type: a ~ [a]
? cannot construct the infinite type: a ~ [a]
是什么意思? I get this error a lot and would like to understand what it means.我经常收到此错误,并想了解它的含义。
The (+):: Num a => a -> a -> a
function adds two numbers (of the same type) together. (+):: Num a => a -> a -> a
function 将两个数字(相同类型)加在一起。 So for example if a ~ Int
, it will add two Int
s together, but not an Int
and a [Int]
.因此,例如,如果a ~ Int
,它将两个Int
加在一起,但不是Int
和[Int]
。
But even if the (+)
operator for example would prepend an item to a list, it would still not reverse the list correctly: your function has no base case what to do for an empty list, and your recursive list does nothing with the first item x
of the list (x:xs)
.但是,即使(+)
运算符例如将一个项目添加到列表中,它仍然无法正确反转列表:您的 function 没有基本情况如何处理空列表,并且您的递归列表与第一个无关列表中的项目x
(x:xs)
。
A simple way to reverse:一个简单的反转方法:
myReverse :: [a] -> [a]
myReverse [] = []
myReverse (x:xs) = myReverse xs ++ [x]
But that is not efficient: appending two items will take linear time in the size of the left list.但这效率不高:添加两个项目将花费左列表大小的线性时间。 You can work with an accumulator: a parameter that you each time update when you make a recursive call.您可以使用累加器:每次进行递归调用时都会更新的参数。 This looks like:这看起来像:
myReverse :: [a] -> [a]
myReverse [] = go []
where go ys (x:xs) = …
where go ys [] = …
where filling in the …
parts are left as an exercise.填写…
部分留作练习。
You have你有
myLast :: [a] -> a
myReverse :: [a] -> [a]
myReverse (x:xs) = myLast xs + myReverse xs
\___a___/ \____[a]___/
(x:xs) :: [a]
---------------
x :: a
xs :: [a] xs :: [a]
myLast :: [a] -> a myReverse :: [a] -> [a]
------------------------- ----------------------------
myLast xs :: a myReverse xs :: [a]
myReverse (x:xs) :: [a]
but但
> :t (+)
(+) :: Num a => a -> a -> a
which means that the type of the thing on the left of +
and the type of the thing on the right must be the same.这意味着+
左边的东西的类型和右边的东西的类型必须相同。
But they can't be: as we just saw above, in your code the first (of myLast xs
) is some type a
, and the second (of myReverse xs
) is [a]
the list of those same a
s.但它们不可能是:正如我们刚刚在上面看到的,在您的代码中,第一个( myLast xs
)是某种类型a
,第二个( myReverse xs
)是[a]
相同a
的列表。
These two can't be the same, because it would mean这两个不能相同,因为这意味着
a ~ [a] OK, this is given to us, then
a ~ [a] we can use it, so that
--------------
a ~ [[a]] this must hold;
a ~ [a] we know this, then
--------------
a ~ [[[a]]] this must also hold; and
a ~ [a] ........
-------------- ........
a ~ [[[[a]]]] ........
.........................
and so on ad infinitum, thus making this a
an "infinite" type.以此类推,无穷无尽,从而使其a
“无限”类型。 Hence the error.因此错误。
You could fix it by replacing the +
with您可以通过将+
替换为
(+++) :: a -> [a] -> [a]
and implementing it to do what you need it to do.并实施它来做你需要它做的事情。
You will also need to fix your off-by-one error whereby you completely ignore the first element in the received input, x
.您还需要修复一个错误,即完全忽略接收到的输入中的第一个元素x
。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.