[英]What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of JQuery and Glow JavaScript Libraries?
任何人都可以比较JQuery和BBC的Glow JavaScript库吗?
BBC's Glow JavaScript Library was just released. BBC的Glow JavaScript Library刚刚发布。 No one outside the BBC has much experience with it yet.
BBC以外没有人对此有过多少经验。
There's an Ajaxian discussion here . 这里有一个讨论才算是Ajax 这里 。
There's a bit of a dustup between jQuery creator John Resig and the BBC here . 有一点jQuery的创始人John Resig的和BBC之间的dustup的位置 。
Glow looks pleasant enough. 发光看起来很愉快。 It'll be interesting to watch changes land.
观察变化的土地会很有趣。 It's open source, hosted at github .
它是开源的, 在github上托管 。
jquery has the advantage of far greater developer support. jquery具有更大的开发人员支持的优势。
As with the Creative Archive licenses (mirroring Creative Commons but restricted to UK), this is arguably a case of 'not-invented-here-syndrome' by the BBC. 与Creative Archive许可证(镜像知识共享但仅限于英国)一样,这可以说是英国广播公司的“未发明在这里 - 综合症”的案例。
As was pointed out in the thread linked to by Nosredna, Glow's selling point (compatibility with older browsers) could have been integrated with jquery via the latter's plugin framework. 正如在Nosredna链接的主题中指出的那样,Glow的卖点(与旧浏览器的兼容性)可以通过后者的插件框架与jquery集成。
其中一个最显着的差异是Glow支持Safari 1.3和2.x ,而jQuery仅支持Safari 3+ 。
JQuery is a mature and widely used and extremely well tested library. JQuery是一个成熟且广泛使用且经过严格测试的库。 I do not know of any compelling features which Glow offers that can offset those facts.
我不知道Glow提供的任何令人信服的功能可以抵消这些事实。 So I would go with JQuery.
所以我会选择JQuery。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.