是否有正确的方法以编程方式防止短暂的错误识别（在 object 检测应用程序中）触发操作？

Question

. Answers to this question are eligible for a +50 reputation bounty. Larvouu wants to to this question.

Context

I'm building an app which performs real-time object detection throught the camera module of the device. The render is like the image below.

Let's say I try to recognize an apple, most of the time the app will recognize an apple. However, sometimes, the app will recognize the wrong fruit (let's say a lemon) on a few camera frames.

Goal

As the recognition of a fruit triggers an action in my code, my goal is to programmatically prevent a brief wrong recognition to trigger an action, and only take into account the majority result .

What I've tried

I tried this way: if the same fruit is recognized several frames in a row , I assumed the result is supposed to be the right one. But as my device process image recognition several times per second, even a wrong guess can be recognized several times in a row, and leads to the wrong action.

Question

Is there any known techniques for avoiding this behavior?

Answer 1

I feel like you've already answered your own question. In general the interpretation of a model's inference is it's own tuning step. You know for example in logistic regression tasks that the threshold does NOT have to be 0.5. In fact, it's quite common to flex the threshold to see what the recall and precision are at various thresholds, and you can pick a threshold that works given your business/product problem. (Fraud detection might favor high recall if you never want to miss any fraud... or high precision if you don't want to annoy users with lots of false positives).

In video this broad concept is extended to multiple frames as you know. You now have the tune the hyperparameters, "how many frames total?" and "how many frames voting [apple]"?

If you are analyzing fruit going down a conveyer belt one by one, and you know each piece of fruit will be in frame for X seconds and you are shooting at 60 fps, maybe you want 60 * X frames. And maybe you want 90% of the frames to agree.

You'll want to visualize how often your detector "flips" detections so you can make a business/product judgement call on what your threshold ought to be.

This answer hasn't been very helpful in giving you a bright line rule here, but I hope it's helpful in suggesting that there is in fact NO bright line rule. You have to understand the problem to set the key hyperparameters:

1. For each frame, is top-1 acc sufficient, or do I need [.75] or higher confidence?
2. How many frames get to vote? Say [100].
3. How many correlated votes are necessary to trigger an actual signal? maybe it's [85].

The above algo assumes you take a hardmax after step 1. another option would be to just average all 100 frames and pick a threshold. that's kind of a soft label version of the above algo.