SKLearn PCA explained_variance_ration cumsum 给出数组 1

Question

I have a problem with PCA. I read that PCA needs clean numeric values. I started my analysis with a dataset called trainDf with shape (1460, 79) .

I did my data cleaning and processing by removing empty values, imputing and dropping columns and I got a dataframe transformedData with shape (1458, 69) .

Data cleaning steps are:

1. LotFrontage imputing with mean value
2. MasVnrArea imputing with 0s (less than 10 cols)
3. Ordinal encoding for categorical columns
4. Electrical imputing with most frequent value

I found outliers with IQR and got withoutOutliers with shape (1223, 69) .

After this, I looked at histograms and decided to apply PowerTransformer on some features and StandardScaler on others and I got normalizedData .

Now I tried doing PCA and I got this:

pca = PCA().fit(transformedData)

print(pca.explained_variance_ratio_.cumsum())

plt.plot(pca.explained_variance_ratio_.cumsum())
plt.xlabel('number of components')
plt.ylabel('cumulative explained variance')

the output of this PCA is the following:

[0.67454179 0.8541084  0.98180307 0.99979932 0.99986346 0.9999237
 0.99997091 0.99997985 0.99998547 0.99999044 0.99999463 0.99999719
 0.99999791 0.99999854 0.99999909 0.99999961 0.99999977 0.99999988
 0.99999994 0.99999998 0.99999999 1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.        ]

Then I tried:

pca = PCA().fit(withoutOutliers)

print(pca.explained_variance_ratio_.cumsum())

plt.plot(pca.explained_variance_ratio_.cumsum())
plt.xlabel('number of components')
plt.ylabel('cumulative explained variance')

out:

[0.68447278 0.86982875 0.99806386 0.99983727 0.99989606 0.99994353
 0.99997769 0.99998454 0.99998928 0.99999299 0.9999958  0.99999775
 0.99999842 0.99999894 0.99999932 0.99999963 0.9999998  0.9999999
 0.99999994 0.99999998 0.99999999 1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.         1.         1.         1.
 1.         1.         1.        ]

Finally:

pca = PCA().fit(normalizedData)

print(pca.explained_variance_ratio_.cumsum())

plt.plot(pca.explained_variance_ratio_.cumsum())
plt.xlabel('number of components')
plt.ylabel('cumulative explained variance')

Out:

[1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.
 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.
 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.]

How is it possible that the last execution gives such an output?

Here are data distributions

transformedData

withoutOutliers

normalizedData

I'll add any further data if necessary, thanks in advance to any who can help!

Answer 1

In short, all data should be scaled before applying PCA (for example using a StandardScaler ).

I got the answer on Data science stackexchange .