简体   繁体   English

如何理解在 group by 和 having 子句中计算不同值的结果

[英]How to understand results of counting distinct values in group by and having clause

Database: version 8.0.26-17 https://www.percona.com/doc/percona-server/8.0/release-notes/Percona-Server-8.0.26-17.html数据库:版本8.0.26-17 https://www.percona.com/doc/percona-server/8.0/release-notes/Percona-Server-8.0.26-17.html

I have two queries that yield different results.我有两个产生不同结果的查询。 I don't understand why.我不明白为什么。

1) 1)

select eev_company_id,
count(distinct maj.dsd_prefix) as maj_cnt,
count(distinct min.dsd_prefix) as min_cnt
from ehev_most_recent as eev
inner join ekohubschema as ehs on  ehs.ehs_subcategory = eev.eev_subcategory
left join datasourcedescription as maj on maj.dsd_prefix = eev.eev_prefix and maj.dsd_type_id = 'MAJ'
left join datasourcedescription as min on min.dsd_prefix = eev.eev_prefix and min.dsd_type_id <> 'MAJ'
where ehs.ehs_category <> 'Exclusionary Factors'
group by eev.eev_company_id
having eev.eev_company_id = 'ADD53604';

result is:结果是:

+----------------+---------+---------+
| eev_company_id | maj_cnt | min_cnt |
+----------------+---------+---------+
| ADD53604       |       2 |       1 |
+----------------+---------+---------+

The second query is pretty much the same but substituted group by eev_company_id having with AND :第二个查询几乎相同,但group by eev_company_id having包含AND

2) 2)

select 
count(distinct maj.dsd_prefix) as maj_cnt,
count(distinct min.dsd_prefix) as min_cnt
from ehev_most_recent as eev
inner join ekohubschema as ehs on ehs.ehs_subcategory = eev.eev_subcategory
left join datasourcedescription as maj on maj.dsd_prefix = eev.eev_prefix and maj.dsd_type_id = 'MAJ'
left join datasourcedescription as min on min.dsd_prefix = eev.eev_prefix and min.dsd_type_id <> 'MAJ'
where ehs.ehs_category <> 'Exclusionary Factors' AND eev.eev_company_id = 'ADD53604';

This query results in:此查询导致:

+---------+---------+
| maj_cnt | min_cnt |
+---------+---------+
|       2 |       0 |
+---------+---------+

As you can see, the min_cnt here is 0 while for the first query it is 1. What is the reason for the difference?如您所见,这里的min_cnt是 0,而对于第一个查询,它是 1。造成差异的原因是什么?

If I remove ekohubschema join I get the same results: 3)如果我删除ekohubschema join,我会得到相同的结果:3)

select eev_company_id,
count(distinct maj.dsd_prefix) as maj_cnt,
count(distinct min.dsd_prefix) as min_cnt
from ehev_most_recent as eev
left join datasourcedescription as maj on maj.dsd_prefix = eev.eev_prefix and maj.dsd_type_id = 'MAJ'
left join datasourcedescription as min on min.dsd_prefix = eev.eev_prefix and min.dsd_type_id <> 'MAJ'
group by eev.eev_company_id
having eev.eev_company_id = 'ADD53604'; 

+----------------+---------+---------+
| eev_company_id | maj_cnt | min_cnt |
+----------------+---------+---------+
| ADD53604       |       2 |       0 |
+----------------+---------+---------+

ekohubschema table has the following columns: ehs_category , ehs_subcategory and ehs_long_description , no company ID whatsoever, and yet it interferes with the result. ekohubschema表具有以下列: ehs_categoryehs_subcategoryehs_long_description ,没有任何公司 ID,但它会干扰结果。

I don't see any minor datasources, only major.我没有看到任何次要数据源,只有主要数据源。 This is why I struggle to find out where the count 1 (for min_cnt ) comes from.这就是为什么我努力找出计数 1(对于min_cnt )的来源。

在此处输入图像描述

Please check the output of this query:请查看此查询的output:

select 
   eev_company_id, 
   min.dsd_prefix
from ehev_most_recent as eev
left join datasourcedescription as min on min.dsd_prefix = eev.eev_prefix and min.dsd_type_id <> 'MAJ'
where eev.eev_company_id = 'ADD53604'; 

I think it (the output) contains at least 1 time a 1 , if not it's a bug.我认为它(输出)至少包含 1 次1 ,否则就是错误。

I did, and I think it's a bug, see: DBFIDDLE .我做到了,我认为这是一个错误,请参阅: DBFIDDLE I reported it here: bug 106539我在这里报告: bug 106539

The bug also exists in MariaDB 10.6, see: DBFIDDLE该bug也存在于MariaDB 10.6,参见: DBFIDDLE

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM