[英]"Inheriting" operations in haskell data types
I have created the following type:我创建了以下类型:
data Inch = Inch Double
instance Show Inch where
show (Inch i) = show i ++ " inches"
Now, I'd like to be able to perform some mathematical operations on this type and, since the type itself is basically just a synonym with Double
I was expecting to get them for free.现在,我希望能够对这种类型执行一些数学运算,并且由于类型本身基本上只是Double
的同义词,因此我希望免费获得它们。 However, this is not the case:然而,这种情况并非如此:
ghci> (3 :: Double) / 2
1.5
ghci> (3 :: Inch) / 2
<interactive>:74:2: error:
• No instance for (Num Inch) arising from the literal ‘3’
• In the first argument of ‘(/)’, namely ‘(3 :: Inch)’
In the expression: (3 :: Inch) / 2
In an equation for ‘it’: it = (3 :: Inch) / 2
<interactive>:74:13: error:
• No instance for (Fractional Inch) arising from a use of ‘/’
• In the expression: (3 :: Inch) / 2
In an equation for ‘it’: it = (3 :: Inch) / 2
I think I can solve this by defining:我想我可以通过定义来解决这个问题:
(/) :: Inch -> Double -> Inch
(Inch i) / n = Inch (i GHC.Real./ n)
This allows the previous code to run fine:这允许前面的代码运行良好:
ghci> (Inch 3) / 2
1.5 inches
But I feel it's cumbersome and can't help thinking there surely must be a better way.但我觉得这很麻烦,不禁想到肯定有更好的方法。 Is there?在那儿?
I would recommend this:我会推荐这个:
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric, DeriveAnyClass #-}
import GHC.Generics
import Data.VectorSpace
data Length = Inches Double
deriving (Generic, Show, AdditiveGroup, VectorSpace)
Then然后
ghci> Inches 3 ^/ 2
Inches 1.5
I'm using the ^/
operator from the vector-space package because that actually has the suitable type v -> Scalar v -> v
.我正在使用向量空间 package 中的^/
运算符,因为它实际上具有合适的类型v -> Scalar v -> v
。 By contrast, the standard /
from the Fractional
class has simply type v -> v -> v
, which would be Length -> Length -> Length
in this case, which does not make sense physically.相比之下, 来自Fractional
class 的标准/
具有简单的类型v -> v -> v
,在这种情况下将是Length -> Length -> Length
,这在物理上没有意义。
You need to tell the compiler that Inch
is a number by making it an instance of some suitable class.您需要通过使其成为一些合适的 class 的实例来告诉编译器Inch
是一个数字。 One option is the Num
class:一种选择是Num
class:
> :info Num
class Num a where
(+) :: a -> a -> a
(-) :: a -> a -> a
(*) :: a -> a -> a
negate :: a -> a
abs :: a -> a
signum :: a -> a
fromInteger :: Integer -> a
{-# MINIMAL (+), (*), abs, signum, fromInteger, (negate | (-)) #-}
Now we define Inch
.现在我们定义Inch
。 I'll use a newtype
instead of data
so we can use GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving
to implement the Num
instance more easily:我将使用新GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving
而不是data
,以便我们可以使用newtype
更轻松地实现Num
实例:
> :set -XGeneralizedNewtypeDeriving
> newtype Inch = Inch Int deriving (Eq, Ord, Read, Show, Num)
> Inch 3 + Inch 5
Inch 8
It is worth noting that Inch is actually not a number - if you try Inch 4 / Inch 2
you get Inch 2
, but to be correct the units should cancel out, leaving a unitless 2
.值得注意的是 Inch 实际上不是一个数字——如果你尝试Inch 4 / Inch 2
你会得到Inch 2
,但是正确的单位应该取消,留下一个没有单位的2
。 But how to deal with that is beyond the scope of this answer, in which I pedantically uses more old fashioned constructs但是如何处理这个问题超出了这个答案的 scope ,我在其中迂腐地使用了更老式的结构
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.