[英]Why is there a discrepancy of active users between Google Analytics and Firebase authenticated users?
For example I get 8 active users based on analytics one day and the same day I can see newly 23 authenticated users with new identifiers (I don't count returning users who got their identifiers earlier).例如,一天我根据分析获得 8 个活跃用户,同一天我可以看到新的 23 个具有新标识符的经过身份验证的用户(我不计算较早获得标识符的返回用户)。 What is the reason for that?
这是什么原因? Which value is more reliable?
哪个值更可靠? Are they bots?
他们是机器人吗? I need to mention that I enforced app check verification.
我需要提到我强制执行了应用程序检查验证。
The count of signed up users from Authentication is different from Analytic's active users count.来自 Authentication 的注册用户数与 Analytic 的活跃用户数不同。 For active users , it is based on the users that have engaged with an app in the device foreground, and have logged a user_engagement event.
对于活跃用户,它基于在设备前台与应用程序互动并记录了user_engagement事件的用户。 The Active User metric is based from the reporting identity setting in your analytics setting.
活跃用户指标基于您的分析设置中的报告身份设置。 Here's how they work:
它们是这样工作的:
By User-ID and device: this method uses the more accurate User-ID if it is collected to identify a user and unify all related events in reporting and analysis. By User-ID and device:如果收集的User-ID用于识别用户并统一报告和分析中的所有相关事件,则此方法使用更准确的User-ID。 If no User-ID is collected, then Analytics uses a device ID, either the Analytics cookie for websites or the App-Instance ID for apps, to identify a user.
如果未收集到用户 ID,则 Analytics 使用设备 ID(网站的 Analytics cookie 或应用程序的 App-Instance ID)来识别用户。 You may apply a "signed in with User ID" filter to deduplicate those users.
您可以应用“使用用户 ID 登录”过滤器来删除这些用户的重复数据。
By device: this method uses only the device ID, either the Analytics cookie for websites or the App-Instance ID for apps, to identify a user, and ignores any User-IDs that were collected.按设备:此方法仅使用设备 ID(网站的 Analytics cookie 或应用的 App-Instance ID)来识别用户,并忽略收集到的任何用户 ID。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.