.NET是否具有线程安全的通用类？

Question

I have implemented my own RingBuffer , but I'm surprised to see that .NET does not have one. Or even a simply thread safe queue, list or collection?

Why doesn't .NET contain thread safe classes? Are they planned for the future?

Answer 1

Thread safety of general purpose collection classes is of dubious value - more often than not, you don't really need individual operations on them (such as Add or the indexer) to be thread-safe, but you rather need group of operations to be thread-safe. For example, if one thread inserts new items into the collection, while another accesses items in a loop via indexer, it won't matter if both of those methods on the collection will lock it - the code is still broken. That said, some old non-generic collection classes in System.Collections , such as Hashtable , are thread-safe.

Now thread-safe Queue and Stack classes are actually useful (the limitations of their protocol make them suitable for general concurrent access), so their omission isn't really by design, but more of an oversight (or, more likely, constrained resources). However, you'll see ConcurrentQueue and ConcurrentStack in .NET 4.0

Answer 2

它们将出现在.NET 4.0中，我相信是System.Threading.Collections命名空间（或者这是我在上次查看的CTP中使用的命名空间）。

Answer 3

The .NET 4.0 Framework introduces several thread-safe collections in the System.Collections.Concurrent Namespace:

ConcurrentBag Represents a thread-safe, unordered collection of objects.

ConcurrentDictionary Represents a thread-safe collection of key-value pairs that can be accessed by multiple threads concurrently.

ConcurrentQueue Represents a thread-safe first in-first out (FIFO) collection.

ConcurrentStack Represents a thread-safe last in-first out (LIFO) collection.